Fusion power’s future
DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.5091
In the review of The Star Builders: Nuclear Fusion and the Race to Power the Planet (Physics Today, October 2021, page 64
Such behavior is not restricted to controlled fusion. The same joke, including the 30-year time frame, used to be said of electric rocket propulsion, and there are now hundreds of spacecraft that use electric propulsion. Perhaps the problem is related to the so-called S curve for technology development. Until a technology rises above the early, exploratory stage, predictions about it becoming mature enough for practical use can be driven more by optimism and enthusiasm than by the available hard facts.
The recent surge in fusion startups 1 might be encouraging (to some), but it’s reminiscent of the early days of aeronautics, when some folks began attempting heavier-than-air flight—and airplanes with heavy piston engines won out over the early aeronautical success of hot-air balloons. The accumulation of ideas and experience directed toward real systems may eventually make a difference for fusion power on its S curve. Electric rocket propulsion was helped by frequent, short-turnaround iterations, thereby providing a time scale for progress apart from the elapsed time. Unfortunately for fusion, the cost and size of useful technical demonstrations may preclude such iterations. Startup fusion concepts that substantially reduce cost and size offer optimism for faster progress.
References
1. D. L. Jassby, Physics and Society, October 2021, p. 5.
More about the Authors
Peter J. Turchi. (nmturchi1@aol.com) Compact Fusion Systems, Santa Fe, New Mexico.