Discover
/
Article

Trees break at a nearly constant wind speed

APR 01, 2016

What’s the maximum load a piece of wood can sustain before breaking? The question has a star-studded history, with contributions from Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo Galilei, the Bernoulli family, and Leonhard Euler, among others. The topic is one of practical importance, with applications in shipbuilding and curve fitting as well as in architecture and engineering. Christophe Clanet and colleagues at École Polytechnique in Palaiseau, France, and ESPCI Paris Tech have now looked at its implications for the ability of live trees to withstand wind. Examining data from the storm Klaus that hit southwest Europe in 2009, the team observed significant overlap between the areas of strongest wind and the areas of most broken trees. Where local wind speeds topped roughly 42 m/s, fewer than half the trees survived, whether softwood pines or hardwood oaks. To explore that connection, the researchers took quite different samples—meter-long beech rods and centimeters-long pencil leads—held them horizontally from one end, and added weight to the other end until they broke. They found that the critical radius of curvature at which the rods broke was independent of length and scaled with the 3⁄2 power of the diameter. That’s consistent with having stress-concentrating defects whose typical sizes scale with the rod diameter. Back outside, the wind’s bending force is distributed over a tree’s length and width. Indeed, one would expect tall, skinny trees to break more readily than short, thick ones. But trees tend not to be both tall and thin simultaneously; rather, they top out at about 1⁄4 of their self-buckling height. Incorporating that allometric relationship, the researchers obtained a formula for the critical wind speed that depends only weakly on tree size. Further accounting for wind gusts yields a value for that critical wind speed suggestively close to what was actually observed. (E. Virot et al., Phys. Rev. E 93, 023001, 2016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.023001 .)

More about the Authors

Richard J. Fitzgerald. rfitzger@aip.org

Related content
/
Article
In the closest thing yet obtained to a movie of a breaking chemical bond, there’s a surprise ending.
/
Article
This Content Appeared In
pt_cover0416_for_Lalena.jpg

Volume 69, Number 4

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.