Discover
/
Article

Humanities scholars experiment with online alternatives to peer review

AUG 24, 2010
Physics Today
New York Times : Applied Physics Letters and other physics journals typically take a few months to process a paper from the receipt of the original manuscript to the publication of the final, peer-reviewed version. In the humanities, the publication process typically takes more than a year. If peer review is responsible for the delay, then some scholars have a solution: Dispense with peer review altogether and rely instead on online comments. The New York Times‘s Patricia Cohen reports this and other experiments in online scholarly publishing.
Related content
/
Article
The finding that the Saturnian moon may host layers of icy slush instead of a global ocean could change how planetary scientists think about other icy moons as well.
/
Article
/
Article
After a foray into international health and social welfare, she returned to the physical sciences. She is currently at the Moore Foundation.
/
Article
Modeling the shapes of tree branches, neurons, and blood vessels is a thorny problem, but researchers have just discovered that much of the math has already been done.

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.