Discover
/
Article

FYI science policy news

MAR 10, 2026
AIP_Lindsay_McKenzie_800x1000.jpg
Science Policy Reporter, FYI AIP
AIP_Clare_Zhang_800x1000.jpg
Science Policy Reporter, FYI FYI
Jacob Taylor headshot
Senior Editor for Science Policy, FYI AIP

For more from FYI, the science policy news service at AIP, visit https://aip.org/fyi .

Challenges await NSF’s next director

The White House formally nominated Jim O’Neill on 2 March to be the next director of NSF. Until recently, O’Neill was acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a position now assumed by Jay Bhattacharya, who also directs the National Institutes of Health. O’Neill worked for the Department of Health and Human Services during the George W. Bush administration and later became an investor, including for the Thiel Foundation’s Breakout Labs, which funded early-stage commercialization of scientific research.

If confirmed by the Senate, O’Neill will head an agency that has undergone rapid change. NSF has been without a director since Sethuraman Panchanathan resigned in April 2025. Since then, the agency has seen staff cuts , grant terminations , grant-review process changes , a restructuring of its divisions and directorates, and a major reduction in the use of rotators —scientists, engineers, and educators who work at NSF on a temporary basis to help set funding priorities and evaluate grant proposals (see the 2022 PT article “Stepping into NSF ” to read about working as a rotator).

At a February meeting of the National Science Board, which oversees NSF, Micah Cheatham, NSF’s chief management officer, said the agency is seeking approval from the Trump administration to hire more staff because its current level of around 1300 employees is “too low.” Cheatham also shared plans to reduce the number of grant solicitations the agency offers and to speed up review processes.

Some NSF projects are experiencing construction delays, according to a Government Accountability Office report published in February. Of the seven major research infrastructure projects in various stages of development, four have fallen several months behind schedule since July of last year. All the delayed projects are still within budget, but some have been reduced in scope. NSF says labor shortages and budgetary uncertainty are contributing to the delays (see the May 2025 PT article “Trump defunds NSF construction budget ”).

The agency is also operating without a headquarters. NSF vacated its former building in Arlington, Virginia, in January. But its new home, in a building a few blocks away, is not yet ready for staff. As a result, most NSF personnel are working remotely with no concrete date set for when they will return to the office. Committee meetings that usually take place in person are being held virtually.

An NSF spokesperson says that work on the agency’s new headquarters began shortly after the lease was signed in December 2025. The spokesperson adds that the agency “quickly established a presence in the building” and that NSF leadership and staff who are involved in outfitting it are on-site daily. NSF “is looking forward to fully occupying the building as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson says. —LM and CZ

Layoffs hit National Laboratory of the Rockies

At least 130 employees were laid off in February at the National Laboratory of the Rockies, previously known as the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The dismissed staff had worked in research and operations roles, according to local news reports . The job losses follow a 10% budget cut to the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, which is a major source of funding for the lab. They also come less than year after the lab laid off 114 employees.

According to its website, the lab employs nearly 4000 people, though it is unclear if that number accounts for the recent rounds of layoffs. Several Democratic members of Colorado’s congressional delegation have spoken out against the dismissals.

DOE renamed the lab in December. In a press release, Assistant Secretary of Energy Audrey Robertson said the name change came about because “the energy crisis we face today is unlike the crisis that gave rise to NREL.” She added, “Our highest priority is to invest in the scientific capabilities that will restore American manufacturing, drive down costs, and help this country meet its soaring energy demand.”

The lab started as the Solar Energy Research Institute and opened in 1977 as part of the federal government’s efforts to mitigate the effects of oil embargoes. The lab was renamed NREL in 1991 when it was absorbed into DOE’s national lab system. —JT and LM

Related Topics
Related content
/
Article
Women will join men in being honored on the Paris icon.
/
Article
The precision measurement and quantum communities are upset about the secretiveness of the move and its potential damage to US science.
/
Article

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.