2009 L’Aquila Earthquake
DOI: 10.1063/PT.5.023217
Physics Today
The region had experienced a large number of minor tremors over the past four months, including a 4.0-magnitude event on 30 March.
Most of the damage surrounds the city of L’Aquila
“We did know there would be quite a lot of damage because of the USGS Pager (Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response) system
Enzo Boschi, the chairman of Italy’s National Institute for Geophysics and Vulcanology, (INGV) told ANSA, an Italian news service
According to the New York Times
Geographical history
Italy is a well-known complex earthquake zone, said Sipkin. “It’s not a simple area like the West Coast of California where you have two large plates sliding against each other along the San Andreas fault.... You have the collision of Africa and Europe, its highly fractured and broken up, there’s a lot of microplates moving around, which creates a lot of different types of fault action. This particular fault zone usually gives extensional earthquakes, but there’s lots of different types of earthquakes that could happen.”
There is a major fault line that runs northâsouth along Italy’s Apennine Mountain Range and a minor eastâwest faultline that runs across the center of the country that produces frequent small earthquakes.
According to the US Geological Survey, the earthquake struck at a depth of 10 kilometers (6.2 miles), with an epicenter approximately 95 kilometers (60 mi) northâeast of Rome, close to L’Aquila. The city has experienced major earthquakes in the past, but nothing on this scale since 1703.
“The duration of ground shaking depends on where you are. If you’re on a hard surface, it ends pretty quickly, but if you’re in a sedimentary built-up valley, then it would last longer,” said Sipkin.
Two smaller quakes
''It was a common tremor for the Apennine mountain chain, one which occurs when underground shelves shift by ten centimeters or so,’' said Boschi. But it is impossible to predict when such tremors will happen, Boschi told ANSA, ''because the parameter variables change constantly. However, in the near future there should be no other ones similar in magnitude to the one last night, although we can expect aftershocks to continue in addition to the over 100 we have already recorded.”
Controversy has erupted over Italian television reports that Gioacchino Giuliani, a laboratory technician, had predicted the earthquake but was told by authorities to take down his findings from a website.
Giuliani used a radon gas technique
Related News Pick
Gran Sasso laboratory undamaged in L’Aquila earthquake
Related Link
Quake ‘Practically Destroys’ University in Italy, With Some Students Trapped or Killed