Xerography: A Study in Innovation and Economic Competitiveness
DOI: 10.1063/1.881427
The general consensus is that the US in recent years has progressively lost competitive ground in a number of critical economic areas—this despite the fact that it has been the world’s leading scientific and technological power and has spent more on nondefense R&D than any other country. Evidently scientific and technological prowess do not guarantee economic competitiveness.
This article is only available in PDF format
References
1. J. Mort, The Anatomy of Xerography, McFarland, Jefferson, N. C. (1989).
2. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 192 (1958). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
N. Mott, E. A. Davis, Electronic Processes in Non‐Crystalline Materials, Oxford U.P., Oxford, UK (1971).3. W. E. Spear, Adv. Phys. 26, 811 (1977).https://doi.org/ADPHAH
4. F. Kodama, Harvard Bus. Rev. 70, 70 (1992).https://doi.org/HABRAX
5. J. Mort, J. Product Innovation Management 8, 32 (1991).
6. M. Koshiyama, Office Equipment and Products 18, A135 (1989).
7. R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass. (1992).
8. J. S. Metcalfe, in Technology and Economic Progress, A. Silbertson, ed., Macmillan, London (1989), p. 54.
9. G. Mensch, Stalemate in Technology, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass. (1979).
10. J. Mort, Int. J. Technol. Management 9, 30 (1994).
11. E. Braun, S. MacDonald, Revolution in Miniature, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, UK (1978).
12. B. Loabsy, Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, UK (1976). ‘.
13. L. D. Tyson, Int. J. Technol. Managements, 5, 225 (1990).
More about the authors
Joseph Mort, Webster Research Center, Webster, New York.
