Discover
/
Article

The teaching of physics in schools

JAN 01, 1961
The following report, prepared for the Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation, was presented at the International Conference on Physics Education, which was held last summer in Paris and is described in the preceding article by J. W. Buchta. As part of its program, this Office of the OEEC is conducting several studies of secondary‐school science education with the aim of bringing the science curricula into line with modern developments in the scientific disciplines. The present document, which is an abbreviated version of a report produced as part of the preparatory work now being undertaken in physics, was prepared by a working group having the following members: Norman Clarke (Great Britain), A. Michels (Holland), M. A. Renaud (Switzerland), D. Sette (Italy), S. Sikjaer (Denmark), J. Topping (Great Britain), and L. Weil (France). The original report was carried over the signature of Dr. Clarke in his role as chairman of the group.
Norman Clarke
A. Michels
M. A. Renaud
D. Sette
S. Sikjaer
J. Topping
L. Weil

Our Committee was set up in order to suggest how the physics curricula in schools could be revised. The nature of any revision is obviously determined largely by the ultimate purpose that physics teaching in schools is considered to have. Our own discussions have been based upon our strong belief that physics, the most exact and fundamental of the sciences, is a vital part of modern culture and, as such, a necessary element in the education of all children. There are some who appear to equate science with technology and who advocate the extended or more intensive teaching of science because of its probable contribution to increased material well‐being. We are well aware of the economic aspects of technological development and of their importance; nevertheless, the cultural value of science—which is all too often inadequately appreciated—should be the aspect which determines the extent and the nature of the science courses in schools. Modern science has changed not only man’s environment but his whole approach to many of the problems which he has to face—and which his predecessors had to face. Science is not only a powerful weapon with which to attack material problems; it provides a new process of thought, and new criteria of credibility and of acceptability of evidence. Philosophy, theology, politics, and economics have all been influenced in differing degrees by science, and the most powerful influences have been the result of the changing picture of natural phenomena that scientific thought has created. In the present context, it cannot be too strongly emphasized that science is one of the humanities. Physics is not a collection of “facts” which can be learned; it is a highly imaginative intellectual structure of concepts that gives a meaningful and creative picture or model of such of man’s experience of the world in which he lives as it has yet been possible to integrate into a consistent whole. It is a picture that is constantly being given further detail and some parts of which are occasionally being redrawn. The reasons why physics has a place in a child’s education are firstly that the story of the drawing of that picture is a remarkable tribute to the power of the human mind and, secondly, the model of nature that physics provides is a necessary component of any fruitful modem thinking about some of the most important of the perennial problems that man has to attempt to solve as a social being.

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Norman Clarke, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

A. Michels, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

M. A. Renaud, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

D. Sette, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

S. Sikjaer, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

J. Topping, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

L. Weil, Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation.

Related content
/
Article
The ability to communicate a key message clearly and concisely to a nonspecialized audience is a critical skill to develop at all educational levels.
/
Article
With strong magnetic fields and intense lasers or pulsed electric currents, physicists can reconstruct the conditions inside astrophysical objects and create nuclear-fusion reactors.
/
Article
A crude device for quantification shows how diverse aspects of distantly related organisms reflect the interplay of the same underlying physical factors.
/
Article
Events held around the world have recognized the past, present, and future of quantum science and technology.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1961_01.jpeg

Volume 14, Number 1

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.