Discover
/
Article

The Materials of Physics Instruction

SEP 01, 1991
The mathematics and science communities are redefining what students should know and how they should learn it. Much new instructional material is available embodying the new reforms.
Gerhard L. Salinger

Since the middle 1980s there has been great ferment in the US over the need to reform education in science, mathematics and technology. Reports such as “A Nation at Risk” and international comparisons of achievement in mathematics and science gave impetus to efforts to develop new materials and improve the education of both in‐service and pre‐service teachers so that they can better educate the students who will become our nation’s scientists, mathematicians, engineers, technicians, workers and voting citizens.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. Natl. Commission on Excellence in Education, A Nation at Risk, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1983).
    Int. Assoc. for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Science Achievement in Seventeen Nations, Pergamon, New York (1988).
    Nat. Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, Educating Americans for the 21st Century, NSF, Washington, D.C. (1983).
    Quality Education for Minorities Project, Education that Works: An Action Plan’for the Education of Minorities, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. (1990).

  2. 2. Natl. Council of Teachers of Math., Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991)
    Reston, Virginia. Mathematical Sciences Ed. Board, Everybody Counts, Natl. Acad. P., Washington D.C. (1989).

  3. 3. E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, A Program Implementation Guide for Cognitively Guided Instruction, School of Education, U. Wisconsin, Madison (1990).

  4. 4. W. Fitzgerald, Middle Grades Mathematics Project, Addison‐Wesley, Menlo Park, Calif. (1986).
    R. Corwin, S. Russell, Used Numbers, Dale Seymour Publications, Palo Alto, Calif. (1990).

  5. 5. F. X. Sutman et al., “Chemistry in the Community: A Five Year Evaluation,” submitted to J. Chem. Ed.

  6. 6. Committee on High School Biology Education, Fulfilling the Promise, Nat. Acad. P., Washington, D.C. (1990).

  7. 7. F. J. Rutherford, A. Ahlgren, Science for All Americans, Oxford U.P., New York (1990).

  8. 8. R. K. Thornton, in Proc. Conf. on Computers in Science Teaching, E. Redish, J. Redish, eds., Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1989).

  9. 9. AAAS, Assessment in the Service of Instruction, A. Champagne, ed., Washington, D.C. (1990).

More about the Authors

Gerhard L. Salinger. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1991_09.jpeg

Volume 44, Number 9

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.