Discover
/
Article

Structured Fluids

JUL 01, 1990
Fluids containing polyatomic structures manifest a wide variety of mechanical responses, and they can exhibit numerous forms of self‐organization.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881249

Thomas A. Witten

Water, gasoline, pancake syrup, mucus, salad oil, cornstarch‐and‐water paste, Silly Putty, liquid dishwashing soap, egg white, glycerin, Vaseline, ketchup, model airplane glue, paint, toothpaste—this motley list of substances seems to defy scientific classification. Water, gasoline, salad oil and glycerin are clearly liquids. The other substances, strictly speaking, are also liquids, since they all flow on the application of stress. But the name “liquid” hardly captures the variety of behavior in these substances. The substances differ from one another in their mechanical responses almost as much as they differ from solids. In the first place, they differ enormously from one another in viscosity, the quantitative measure of a liquid’s flow response. Furthermore, many of them have striking properties whose description requires variables besides viscosity. Syrup becomes sticky as it dries. Liquid dishwashing soap has the same consistency as syrup, but it does not become sticky on drying. Mucus, egg white and model airplane glue are springy and rubbery. Silly Putty and cornstarch paste flow on a tilted surface but shatter like a brittle solid on sudden impact. Dishwashing soap in water easily forms masses of long‐lived foam. Even the simplest flow properties of toothpaste are qualitatively unliquid‐like: It comes out of its tube as a plug rather unlike an ordinary liquid, which flows fastest in the middle of the opening.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. Many of the phenomena discussed in this article are reviewed in more detail in S. A. Safran, N. Clark, eds., Physics of Complex and Supermolecular Fluids, Wiley, New York (1987).

  2. 2. See, for example, K. Kendall, Contemp. Phys. 21, 277 (1980).https://doi.org/CTPHAF

  3. 3. See, for example, R. E. Rosensweig, in Physics of Complex and Supermolecular Fluids, S. A. Safran, N. A. Clark, Wiley, New York (1987), p. 699

  4. 4. A. Chowdhury, B. J. Ackerson, N. A. Clark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 833 (1985).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  5. 5. M. M. Burns, J. M. Fournier, J. A. Golovchenko, Phys. Rev. Letts. 63, 1233 (1989).

  6. 6. B. Ackerson, in Physics of Complex and Supermolecular Fluids, S. A. Safran, N. Clark, eds., Wiley, New York (1987), p. 553

  7. 7. See, for example, M. Y. Lin, H. N. Lindsay, D. A. Weitz, R. C. Ball, R. Klein, Nature 339, 360 (1989). https://doi.org/NATUAS
    R. Jullien, R. Botet, Aggregation and Fractal Aggregates, World Scientific, Singapore (1987).

  8. 8. For a recent review, see D. S. Pearson, Rubber Chem. Technol. 60, 439 (1987).https://doi.org/RCTEA4

  9. 9. J. Lumley, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 367 (1969). [vol??].

  10. 10. For a discussion of possible mechanisms, see P. G. de Gennes, Physica (Utrecht) 140A, 9 (1986);
    G. Ryskin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2059 (1987); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    W. M. Kulicke, M. Kotter, H. Grager, Adv. Polymer Sci. 89, 1 (1989).https://doi.org/APSIDK

  11. 11. R. M. Davis, W. B. Russel, Macromolecules 20, 518 (1987).https://doi.org/MAMOBX

  12. 12. E. Helfand, G. H. Fredrickson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2468 (1989); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2472 (1989).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  13. 13. M. Doi, S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics, Oxford U.P., Oxford (1986).

  14. 14. P. A. Irvine, P. Smith, Macromolecules 19, 240 (1986).https://doi.org/MAMOBX

  15. 15. See, for example, M. E. Cates, D. Andelman, S. A. Safran, D. Roux, Langmuir 4, 802 (1988).https://doi.org/LANGD5

  16. 16. J. Candau, in Physics of Complex and Supermolecular Fluids, S. A. Safran, N. A. Clark, eds., Wiley, New York (1987), p. 569

  17. 17. See, for example, M. E. Cates, J. Phys. (Paris) 49, 1593 (1988).https://doi.org/JOPQAG

  18. 18. T. A. Witten, J. Phys. (Paris) 49, 1055 (1988).https://doi.org/JOPQAG

  19. 19. E. L. Thomas, D. J. Kinning, D. B. Alward, C. S. Henkee, Macromolecules 20, 2934 (1987).https://doi.org/MAMOBX

  20. 20. K. Kremer, G. S. Grest, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5057 (1990).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  21. 21. Chris S. Henkee, unpublished.
    See also C. S. Henkee, E. L. Thomas, L. J. Fetters, J. Mater. Sci. 23, 1685 (1988); https://doi.org/JMTSAS
    C. S. Henkee, E. L. Thomas, D. C. Martin, L. J. Fetters, Polym Prepr., 29, 462 (1988).

More about the Authors

Thomas A. Witten. University of Chicago.

Related content
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
/
Article
Bottom-up self-assembly is a powerful approach to engineering at small scales. Special strategies are needed to formulate components that assemble into predetermined shapes with precise sizes.
/
Article
The polymath scientist leaves behind a monumental legacy in both the scientific and political realms.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1990_07.jpeg

Volume 43, Number 7

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.