Shape‐memory phenomena
DOI: 10.1063/1.2916195
If you deform an ordinary material below its elastic limit and keep it below its annealing temperature, it will return to its original shape once the load is removed. If the stress is too large, however, or if the temperature is allowed to become too high, the deformation becomes permanent, and the material retains no memory of its original shape.
This article is only available in PDF format
References
1. Shape Memory Effects in Alloys, J. Perkins, ed. Plenum, New York (1975).
2. D. S. Easton, C. C. Koch, in reference 1, page 431.
3. A. Olander, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54, 3819 (1932); https://doi.org/JACSAT
L. C. Chang, T. A. Read, Trans. AIME 189, 47 (1951).https://doi.org/TAIMAF4. D. S. Lieberman, in reference 1, page 208.
5. C. M. Jackson, H. J. Wagner, R. J. Wasilewski, 55‐Nitinol—The Alloy with a Memory, NASA‐SP‐5110, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1972).
6. A. A. Golestaneh, Acta Metal. 28, 1427 (1980). The engine in this paper, and in figure 1 here, is US Patent number 4302939 DOE/TIC/WG‐82/181.https://doi.org/AMETAR
7. A. A. Golestaneh, Proc. Int. Conf. Martensitic Transformation, ICOMAT 1979, page 715.
8. See, for instance, J. W. Christian, The Theory of Transformation in Metals and Alloys, Peragmon, New York (1965);
also Phase Transformation, Am. Soc. Metals, Metals Park, Ohio (1968).9. T. Saburi, C. M. Wayman, K. Takata, S. Nemo, Acta. Metal. 28, 15 (1980).https://doi.org/AMETAR
10. A. A. Golestaneh, Res Mechanics Lett. 1, 397 (1981).
11. A. A. Golestaneh, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 1241 (1978).https://doi.org/JAPIAU
12. F. C. Frank, Acta. Metall. 1, 15 (1953). https://doi.org/AMETAR
For crystallographic models of the martensite, see also references 8 and 9 and G. M. Michel, R. Sinclair, Acta Cryst. B37, 1803 (1981).
More about the authors
Ahmad A. Golestaneh, Northwestern University Technological Institute, Evanston, Illinois.
