Discover
/
Article

Shape isomers and the double‐humped barrier

DEC 01, 1971
How four independent puzzles in nuclear physics converge in a single, unifying explanation—some nuclei can exist in two different shapes.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3022472

David D. Clark

Efforts to express the total binding energy of the nucleus in terms of the atomic number, the number of neutrons and the shape of the nucleus form an old and continuing search. An accurate expression for this function would help us understand many nuclear phenomena, for example the fission barrier: Under what conditions and in what ways do nuclei fly apart?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. S. M. Polikanov, V. A. Drum, V. A. Kamaukhov, V. L. Mikheev, A. A. Pleve, N. K. Skobelev, V. G. Subbotin, G. M. Ter‐Akop’yan, V. A. Fomichev, Sov. Phys.—JETP 15, 1016 (1962).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  2. 2. G. N. Flerov, Yu. P. Gangrsky, B. N. Markov, A. A. Pleve, S. M. Polikanov, H. Jungclaussen, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. (6, 12 (1968).

  3. 3. J. R. Huizenga, R. Vandenbosch, Phys. Rev. 120, 1305 (1960).

  4. 4. Yu. V. Lobanov, V. I. Kuznetsov, V. P. Perelygin, S. M. Polikanov, Yu. Ts. Oganesyan, G. N. Flerov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1, 67 (1965).https://doi.org/SJNCAS

  5. 5. S. M. Polikanov, Sov. Phys.‐Usp. 11, 22 (1968).https://doi.org/SOPUAP

  6. 6. S. Bjo/rnholm, J. Borggreen, L. Westgaard, V. A. Karnaukhov, Nucl. Phys. A95, 513 (1967).

  7. 7. G. N. Flerov, A. A. Pleve, S. M. Polikanov, S. P. Tretyakova, N. Martalogu, D. Poenaru, M. Sezon, I. Vilcov, N. Vilcov, Nucl. Phys. A97, 444 (1967).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  8. 8. S. Jagare, Phys. Lett. 32B, 571 (1970).

  9. 9. J. Borggreen, Yu. P. Gangrsky, G. Sletten, S. Bjo/rnholm, Phys. Lett. 25B, 402 (1967).

  10. 10. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nuclear Structure, Dubna, 1968 (IAEA, Vienna, 1968).

  11. 11. N. L. Lark, G. Sletten, J. Pedersen, S. Bjo/rnholm, Nucl. Phys. A139, 481 (1969).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  12. 12. S. Bjo/rnholm, V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A136, (1969).

  13. 13. S. G. Nilsson, C. F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, Z. Szymanski, S. Wycech, C. Gustafson, I. Lamm, P. Möller, B. Nilsson, Nucl. Phys. A131, 1 (1969).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  14. 14. Proceedings of the Second IAEA Symposium on Physics and Chemistry of Fission, Vienna, 1969 (IAEA, Vienna, 1969).

  15. 15. S. M. Polikanov, G. Sletten, Nucl. Phys. A151, 656 (1970).

  16. 16. R. Repnow, V. Metag, P. von Brentano, Z. Physik 243, 418 (1971).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  17. 17. H. C. Britt, S. C. Burnett, B. H. Erkkila, J. E. Lynn, W. E. Stein, Phys. Rev. C 4, 1444 (1971); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    H. C. Britt, S. C. Burnett, B. H. Erkkila, J. E. Lynn, W. E. Stein, Phys. Lett. 31B, 523 (1970).

  18. 18. L. C. Gomes, J. D. Walecka, V. F. Weisskopf, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 241 (1958).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  19. 19. W. D. Myers, W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  20. 20. S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat.‐Fys. Medd. 29, No. 16 (1955).

  21. 21. C. Gustafson, I. Lamm, B. Nilsson, S. G. Nilsson, Arkiv. Fysik. 36, 613 (1967).

  22. 22. W. H. Bassichis, L. Wilets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 799 (1969).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  23. 23. V. M. Strutinsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 3, 449 (1966); https://doi.org/SJNCAS
    V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A95, 420 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
    V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A122, 1 (1968).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  24. 24. M. Brack, J. Damgaard, H. C. Pauli, A. S. Jensen, V. M. Strutinsky, C. Y. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. (to be published).

  25. 25. U. Mosel, H. W. Schmitt, Nucl. Phys. A165, 73 (1971).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  26. 26. E. Migneco, J. P. Theobald, Nucl. Phys. A112, 603 (1968).

  27. 27. P. E. Vorotnikov, S. M. Dubrovina, V. A. Shigin, G. A. Otroschenko, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 5, 210 (1967); https://doi.org/SJNCAS
    L. G. Earwaker, G. D. James, ref. 14, page 911.

  28. 28. J. E. Lynn, The Theory of Neutron Resonance Reactions, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1968), chapter 8, sections 11 and 12.

  29. 29. J. Pedersen, B. D. Kuzminov, Phys. Lett. 29B, 176 (1969).

  30. 30. B. H. Erkkila, R. B. Leachman, Nucl. Phys. A108, 689 (1968).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  31. 31. R. L. Ferguson, F. Plasil, G. D. Alam, H. W. Schmitt, Phys. Lett. 31B, 526 (1970).

  32. 32. P. A. Russo, R. Vandenbosch, M. Mehta, J. R. Tesmer, K. L. Wolf, Phys. Rev. C3, 1595 (1971).

  33. 33. S. Bjo/rnholm, J. Borggreen, E. K. Hyde, Nucl. Phys. A156, 561 (1970).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  34. 34. W. Lin, Phys. Rev. C2, 871 (1970).

  35. 35. H. C. Pauli, T. Ledergerber, M. Brack, Phys. Lett. 34B, 264 (1971);
    J. R. Nix, M. Bolsterli, E. O. Fiset, J. Norton, reference 14, page 183.

More about the Authors

David D. Clark. Ward Laboratory of Nuclear Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Related content
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
/
Article
Bottom-up self-assembly is a powerful approach to engineering at small scales. Special strategies are needed to formulate components that assemble into predetermined shapes with precise sizes.
/
Article
The polymath scientist leaves behind a monumental legacy in both the scientific and political realms.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1971_12.jpeg

Volume 24, Number 12

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.