Discover
/
Article

Shape isomers and the double‐humped barrier

DEC 01, 1971
How four independent puzzles in nuclear physics converge in a single, unifying explanation—some nuclei can exist in two different shapes.
David D. Clark

Efforts to express the total binding energy of the nucleus in terms of the atomic number, the number of neutrons and the shape of the nucleus form an old and continuing search. An accurate expression for this function would help us understand many nuclear phenomena, for example the fission barrier: Under what conditions and in what ways do nuclei fly apart?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. S. M. Polikanov, V. A. Drum, V. A. Kamaukhov, V. L. Mikheev, A. A. Pleve, N. K. Skobelev, V. G. Subbotin, G. M. Ter‐Akop’yan, V. A. Fomichev, Sov. Phys.—JETP 15, 1016 (1962).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  2. 2. G. N. Flerov, Yu. P. Gangrsky, B. N. Markov, A. A. Pleve, S. M. Polikanov, H. Jungclaussen, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. (6, 12 (1968).

  3. 3. J. R. Huizenga, R. Vandenbosch, Phys. Rev. 120, 1305 (1960).

  4. 4. Yu. V. Lobanov, V. I. Kuznetsov, V. P. Perelygin, S. M. Polikanov, Yu. Ts. Oganesyan, G. N. Flerov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1, 67 (1965).https://doi.org/SJNCAS

  5. 5. S. M. Polikanov, Sov. Phys.‐Usp. 11, 22 (1968).https://doi.org/SOPUAP

  6. 6. S. Bjo/rnholm, J. Borggreen, L. Westgaard, V. A. Karnaukhov, Nucl. Phys. A95, 513 (1967).

  7. 7. G. N. Flerov, A. A. Pleve, S. M. Polikanov, S. P. Tretyakova, N. Martalogu, D. Poenaru, M. Sezon, I. Vilcov, N. Vilcov, Nucl. Phys. A97, 444 (1967).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  8. 8. S. Jagare, Phys. Lett. 32B, 571 (1970).

  9. 9. J. Borggreen, Yu. P. Gangrsky, G. Sletten, S. Bjo/rnholm, Phys. Lett. 25B, 402 (1967).

  10. 10. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nuclear Structure, Dubna, 1968 (IAEA, Vienna, 1968).

  11. 11. N. L. Lark, G. Sletten, J. Pedersen, S. Bjo/rnholm, Nucl. Phys. A139, 481 (1969).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  12. 12. S. Bjo/rnholm, V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A136, (1969).

  13. 13. S. G. Nilsson, C. F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, Z. Szymanski, S. Wycech, C. Gustafson, I. Lamm, P. Möller, B. Nilsson, Nucl. Phys. A131, 1 (1969).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  14. 14. Proceedings of the Second IAEA Symposium on Physics and Chemistry of Fission, Vienna, 1969 (IAEA, Vienna, 1969).

  15. 15. S. M. Polikanov, G. Sletten, Nucl. Phys. A151, 656 (1970).

  16. 16. R. Repnow, V. Metag, P. von Brentano, Z. Physik 243, 418 (1971).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  17. 17. H. C. Britt, S. C. Burnett, B. H. Erkkila, J. E. Lynn, W. E. Stein, Phys. Rev. C 4, 1444 (1971); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    H. C. Britt, S. C. Burnett, B. H. Erkkila, J. E. Lynn, W. E. Stein, Phys. Lett. 31B, 523 (1970).

  18. 18. L. C. Gomes, J. D. Walecka, V. F. Weisskopf, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 241 (1958).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  19. 19. W. D. Myers, W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  20. 20. S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat.‐Fys. Medd. 29, No. 16 (1955).

  21. 21. C. Gustafson, I. Lamm, B. Nilsson, S. G. Nilsson, Arkiv. Fysik. 36, 613 (1967).

  22. 22. W. H. Bassichis, L. Wilets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 799 (1969).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  23. 23. V. M. Strutinsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 3, 449 (1966); https://doi.org/SJNCAS
    V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A95, 420 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
    V. M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A122, 1 (1968).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  24. 24. M. Brack, J. Damgaard, H. C. Pauli, A. S. Jensen, V. M. Strutinsky, C. Y. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. (to be published).

  25. 25. U. Mosel, H. W. Schmitt, Nucl. Phys. A165, 73 (1971).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  26. 26. E. Migneco, J. P. Theobald, Nucl. Phys. A112, 603 (1968).

  27. 27. P. E. Vorotnikov, S. M. Dubrovina, V. A. Shigin, G. A. Otroschenko, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 5, 210 (1967); https://doi.org/SJNCAS
    L. G. Earwaker, G. D. James, ref. 14, page 911.

  28. 28. J. E. Lynn, The Theory of Neutron Resonance Reactions, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1968), chapter 8, sections 11 and 12.

  29. 29. J. Pedersen, B. D. Kuzminov, Phys. Lett. 29B, 176 (1969).

  30. 30. B. H. Erkkila, R. B. Leachman, Nucl. Phys. A108, 689 (1968).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  31. 31. R. L. Ferguson, F. Plasil, G. D. Alam, H. W. Schmitt, Phys. Lett. 31B, 526 (1970).

  32. 32. P. A. Russo, R. Vandenbosch, M. Mehta, J. R. Tesmer, K. L. Wolf, Phys. Rev. C3, 1595 (1971).

  33. 33. S. Bjo/rnholm, J. Borggreen, E. K. Hyde, Nucl. Phys. A156, 561 (1970).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  34. 34. W. Lin, Phys. Rev. C2, 871 (1970).

  35. 35. H. C. Pauli, T. Ledergerber, M. Brack, Phys. Lett. 34B, 264 (1971);
    J. R. Nix, M. Bolsterli, E. O. Fiset, J. Norton, reference 14, page 183.

More about the authors

David D. Clark, Ward Laboratory of Nuclear Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Related content
/
Article
The ability to communicate a key message clearly and concisely to a nonspecialized audience is a critical skill to develop at all educational levels.
/
Article
With strong magnetic fields and intense lasers or pulsed electric currents, physicists can reconstruct the conditions inside astrophysical objects and create nuclear-fusion reactors.
/
Article
A crude device for quantification shows how diverse aspects of distantly related organisms reflect the interplay of the same underlying physical factors.
/
Article
Events held around the world have recognized the past, present, and future of quantum science and technology.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1971_12.jpeg

Volume 24, Number 12

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.