Discover
/
Article

Roundtable: Physics in Transition

FEB 01, 1993
Recent scientific developments, new research instruments and different political and economic demands caused by the end of the cold war and the instability of corporate America are making changes in physics increasingly apparent. Roundtable participants discuss the immediate future of physics.
Judith L. Bostock
D. Allan Bromley
Ralph E. Gomory
Daniel Kleppner
Albert J. Libchaber
Walter E. Massey
Alan Schriesheim
Richard N. Zare

The question before us can be stated simply: Where do we go from here? The “we” is the physics community, though it’s our hope that the discussion will range more widely into science and technology, so we’ll be able to comment on the changes likely to take place in research universities, national laboratories and private industry. Our subject is physics in transition to the 21st century. Some say physics has been in a state of transition for well over a century—certainly since James Clerk Maxwell in the 19th century. In every decade of the 20th century, physics has experienced momentous turning points. In this last decade of the century we seem to have reached another turning point with the end of nuclear weapons rivalry that was given the name of cold war and the increase of global industrial competitiveness. In the past year, pressures by the Federal government and by commercial companies have increased to make physics and the rest of science more relevant to business and to society. We are already witnessing the reduction of physics research at some major corporate laboratories and sensing a shakeup for physics facilities at some national labs. So this discussion of the future of physics is timely.

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Judith L. Bostock, South Carolina Universities.

D. Allan Bromley, Yale University.

Ralph E. Gomory, Science and Technology, IBM.

Daniel Kleppner, American Physical Society.

Albert J. Libchaber, Princeton University, NEC Research Institute, Princeton, New Jersey.

Walter E. Massey, University of Chicago.

Alan Schriesheim, Argonne National Laboratory.

Richard N. Zare, Stanford University.

Gloria B. Lubkin, PHYSICS TODAY.

Irwin Goodwin, PHYSICS TODAY.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1993_02.jpeg

Volume 46, Number 2

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.