/
Article

Quantum Theory without Observers—Part One

MAR 01, 1998
Despite the claims of most of the founding fathers, the appeal at a fundamental level to observers and measurement, so prominent in orthodox quantum theory, is not needed to account for quantum phenomena.
Sheldon Goldstein

Since its inception some 70 years ago and despite its extraordinary predictive successes, quantum mechanics has been plagued by conceptual difficulties. Plainly put, the basic problem is this: It is not at all clear what quantum mechanics is about. What, in fact, does quantum mechanics describe?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, England (1987).

  2. 2. E. Schrädinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935);
    English trans. by J. D. Trimmer, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 124, 323 (1980); https://doi.org/PAPCAA
    reprinted in J. A. Wheeler, W. H. Zurek, eds., Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1983).

  3. 3. P. A. Schilpp, ed., Albert Einstein, Philosopher‐Scientist, Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, III. (1949).

  4. 4. W. Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy, Harper and Row, New York (1958), p. 129.

  5. 5. W. Heisenberg, The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, trans. by A. J. Pomerans, Harcourt Brace, New York (1958), p. 15.

  6. 6. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  7. 7. R. B. Griffiths, J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).

  8. 8. R. Omnes, J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893, 933 (1988).

  9. 9. M. Gell‐Mann, J. B. Hartle, in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, W. Zurek, ed., Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1990), p. 425.
    M. Gell‐Mann, J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3345 (1993).

  10. 10. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862 (1982).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
    W. H. Zurek, PHYSICS TODAY, October 1991, p. 36 and April 1993, p. 84.

  11. 11. S. Goldstein, D. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3715 (1995).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. A. M. Gleason, J. Math. and Mech. 6, 885 (1957).

  13. 13. J. S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    reprinted in ref. 1.

  14. 14. N. D. Mermin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803 (1993).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  15. 15. S. Kochen, E. P. Specker, J. Math. and Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

  16. 16. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964);
    reprinted in ref. 1.

  17. 17. L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993).
    S. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1951 (1994).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  18. 18. M. Gell‐Mann, J. B. Hartle, in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on High Energy Physics, K. K. Phua, Y. Yamaguchi, eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1990).

More about the authors

Sheldon Goldstein, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

In These Collections
Related content
/
Article
To go beyond classical models and tie our understanding of gravity to the quantum world, experiments are needed.
/
Article
The first African American physicist to earn a PhD made the best of a difficult career path.
/
Article
Apprehension about career pathways and research funding dominated the list of concerns expressed by physics and astronomy undergraduates in a recent survey.
/
Article
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1998_03.jpeg

Volume 51, Number 3

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.