Quantum Point Contacts

JUL 01, 1996

The quantization of ballistic electron transport through a constriction demonstrates that “conduction is transmission.”

Henk van Houten

Carlo Beenakker

Punctuated equilibrium, the notion that evolution in nature is stepwise rather than continuous, sometimes applies to evolution in science as well. The seed of a scientific breakthrough may slumber for a decade or even longer without generating much interest. The seed may be a theoretical concept without clear predictions to test experimentally, or an intriguing but confusing experiment without a lucid interpretation. When the seed finally germinates, an entire field of science can reach maturity in a few years.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. For a historical account of the controversy, from two different perspectives, see R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 306 (1988); https://doi.org/IBMJAE
A. D. Stone, A. Szafer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 384 (1988).https://doi.org/IBMJAE
2. R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223 (1957).https://doi.org/IBMJAE
3. Y. Imry, in Directions in Condensed Matter Physics, G. Grinstein, G. Mazenko, eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1986).
4. Yu. V. Sharvin, Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 655 (1965).https://doi.org/SPHJAR
5. References are given in the review by C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Solid State Phys. 44, 1 (1991).https://doi.org/SSPHAE
6. B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. B 43, 12431 (1991).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
7. D. A. Wharam, T. J. Thornton, R. Newbury, M. Pepper, H. Ahmed, J. E. F. Frost, D. G. Hasko, D. C. Peacock, D. A. Ritchie, G. A. C. Jones, J. Phys. C 21, 209 (1988).https://doi.org/JPSOAW
8. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9375 (1988).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
9. J. K. Gimzewski, R. Möller, Phys. Rev. B 36, 1284 (1987).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
10. J. M. Krans, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, V. V. Fisun, I. K. Yanson, L. J. de Jongh, Nature 375, 767 (1995).https://doi.org/NATUAS
11. E. A. Montie, E. C. Cosman, G. W. ‘t Hooft, M. B. van der Mark, C. W. J. Beenakker, Nature 350, 594 (1991).https://doi.org/NATUAS
12. A. W. Snyder, C. Pask, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 806 (1973).https://doi.org/JOSAAH
13. C. W. J. Beenakker, H. van Houten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3056 (1991). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
A. Furusaki, H. Takayanagi, M. Tsukada, Phys. Rev. B 45, 10563 (1992).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
H. Takayanagi, T. Akazaki, J. Nitta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3533 (1995).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
14. L. W. Molenkamp, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, R. Eppenga, C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1052 (1990). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
P. Streda, J. Phys. Cond. Matter 1, 1025 (1989).https://doi.org/JCOMEL
15. R. A. Wyss, C. C. Eugster, J. A. del Alamo, Q. Hu, M. J. Rooks, M. R. Melloch, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1144 (1995).https://doi.org/APPLAB
16. G. B. Lesovik, JETP Lett. 49, 592 (1989). https://doi.org/JTPLA2
M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3340 (1995).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
17. H. van Houten, B. J. van Wees, J. E. Mooij, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, C. T. Foxon, Europhys. Lett. 5, 721 (1988); https://doi.org/EULEEJ
H. van Houten, B. J. van Wees, J. E. Mooij, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. B 39, 8556 (1989).
18. V. J. Goldman, B. Su, J. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2065 (1994).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

More about the Authors

Henk van Houten. Leiden University, the Netherlands.

Carlo Beenakker. Leiden University.