Discover
/
Article

Quantum mechanics and reality

SEP 01, 1970
Could the solution to the dilemma of indeterminism be a universe in which all possible outcomes of an experiment actually occur?
Bryce S. DeWitt

Despite its enormous practical success, quantum theory is so contrary to intuition that, even after 45 years, the experts themselves still do not all agree what to make of it. The area of disagreement centers primarily around the problem of describing observations. Formally, the result of a measurement is a superposition of vectors, each representing the quantity being observed as having one of its possible values. The question that has to be answered is how this superposition can be reconciled with the fact that in practice we only observe one value. How is the measuring instrument prodded into making up its mind which value it has observed?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955).

  2. 2. H. Margenau, Phil. Sci. 4, 337 (1937);
    H. Margenau, PHYSICS TODAY 7, no. 10, 6 (1954).

  3. 3. B. S. DeWitt, Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields, Gordon and Breach, New York (1965), pp. 16–29.

  4. 4. N. Bohr, L. Rosenfeld, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.‐Fys. Medd. 12, no. 8 (1933).

  5. 5. E. P. Wigner, “Remarks on the Mind–Body Question,” in The Scientist Speculates (I. J. Good, ed), William Heinemann Ltd, London (1961).
    Reprinted in E. P. Wigner, Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1967).

  6. 6. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 and (1952);
    D. Bohm, 87, 389 (1952);
    D. Bohm, 89, 319 and (1953).

  7. 7. D. Bohm, J. Bub, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 453 and (1966).

  8. 8. A. Petersen, Quantum Physics and the Philosophical Tradition, MIT Press, Cambridge (1968).

  9. 9. W. Heisenberg, “Quantum Theory and Its Interpretation,” in Niels Bohr (S. Rozental, ed), North Holland, Wiley, New York (1967).

  10. 10. H. EverettIII, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  11. 11. J. A. Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 463 (1957).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  12. 12. R. N. Graham, PhD thesis, University of North Carolina (in preparation).

  13. 13. B. S. DeWitt, “The Everett–Wheeler Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” in Battelle Rencontres, 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics (C. DeWitt, J. A. Wheeler, eds), W. A. Benjamin Inc., New York (1968).

More about the authors

Bryce S. DeWitt, University of North Carolina.

In These Collections
Related content
/
Article
A half century after the discovery of Hawking radiation, we are still dealing with the quantum puzzle it exposed.
/
Article
Since the discovery was first reported in 1999, researchers have uncovered many aspects of the chiral-induced spin selectivity effect, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
/
Article
Metrologists are using fundamental physics to define units of measure. Now NIST has developed new quantum sensors to measure and realize the pascal.
/
Article
Nanoscale, topologically protected whirlpools of spins have the potential to move from applications in spintronics into quantum science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1970_09.jpeg

Volume 23, Number 9

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.