Discover
/
Article

Prospects for a gamma‐ray laser

FEB 01, 1975
Development of a “graser” may be possible if ways can be found to achieve Mössbauer transitions and population inversion simultaneously in nuclear isomers.
G. C. Baldwin
R. V. Khokhlov

Lasers generating wavelengths shorter than one angstrom unit would have many important applications. Ever since the discovery of the Mössbauer effect it has been realized that we would be able to stimulate nuclear transitions suitable for lasers in this range if we could prepare the population inversion on which lasers depend, and it has also long been known that some nuclear isomers are producible in a state of population inversion. Why then do we not yet have any operating gamma‐ray lasers?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. A. Einstein, Phys. Zeitschr. 18, 121, (1917); https://doi.org/PHZTAO
    B. Lengyel, Lasers, Wiley, New York, (1962); section 3, pages 3–10;
    A. Yariv, Quantum Electronics, Wiley, New York (1967), pages 208–210.

  2. 2. L. Landau, E. Lifschitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, English trans. by J. B. Sykes and J. S. Bell, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Mass., (1960); page 377.

  3. 3. A. L. Schawlow, C. H. Townes, Phys. Rev. 112, 1949 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. G. C. Baldwin, in Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena, Vol. 3, (H. Schwarz, H. Hora, eds.) Plenum, New York (1974), pages 875–888.

  5. 5. W. Vali, V. Vali, Proc. IEEE 51, 182 (1963).https://doi.org/IEEPAD

  6. 6. B. V. Chirikov, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 17, 1355 (1963).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  7. 7. G. C. Baldwin, J. P. Neissel, J. H. Terhune, L. Tonks, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 6, 176 (1963).https://doi.org/TANSAO

  8. 8. G. C. Baldwin, J. P. Neissel, J. H. Terhune, L. Tonks, Proc. IEEE 51, 1247 (1963).https://doi.org/IEEPAD

  9. 9. Unpublished reports on this subject include: L. Rivlin, Soviet Patent Disclosure Jan. 1961, cited by Chirikov in reference 6;
    G. C. Baldwin, J. P. Neissel, L. Tonks, Patent Disclosure October 1961 and Internal General Electric Reports 62GL22, 62GL178, February and December 1962;
    B. Podolsky, J. Mize, C. Carpenter, AVCO Internal Report 63AVCO‐109, August 1963;
    R. Babcock, S. Ruby, L. Epstein, Westinghouse Report, December 1963.
    US Patents related to stimulated emission in nuclear states include: Baldwin et al., 3 234 099;
    Vali et al., 3 281 600;
    Eerckens, 3 430 046;
    Piekenbrock, 3 557 370.

  10. 10. Mössbauer Effect, (Selected reprints), American Association of Physics Teachers (1963).

  11. 11. J. H. Terhune, G. C. Baldwin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 589 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. R. V. Khokhlov, Sov Phys‐JETP Lett. 15, 414 (1972);
    Paper A4, Proc. VII IQEC, Montreal, May 1972.

  13. 13. Nuclear Data Sheets, edited by the Nuclear Data Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (W. J. Horen, Director), published by Academic Press, New York; contains frequently revised compilations of isomer properties.

  14. 14. V. I. Goldanskii, Yu. Kagan, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 37, 49 (1973).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  15. 15. J. D. Shipman, Jr, Appl. Phys. Lett. 10, 3 (1967).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  16. 16. G. W. Grodstein, “X‐Ray Attenuation Coefficients from 10 keV to 100 MeV,” NBS‐583, Nat. Bur. Stds., Washington, 1957.

  17. 17. G. Borrmann, Zeits. Phys. 42, 157 (1941).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  18. 18. P. P. Ewald, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 46 (1965); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    B. Batterman, H. Cole, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 681 (1964).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  19. 19. Yu. Kagan, Sov. Phys.‐JETP Lett. 20, 11 (1974).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  20. 20. V. I. Goldanskii, Yu. Kagan, Sov. Phys.‐Uspekhi 16, Jan.–Feb., 1974; https://doi.org/SOPUAP
    Proc. Vth Int. Conf. on Mössbauer Spectroscopy, Bratislava, Sept. 1973.

  21. 21. V. S. Letokhov, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 37, 787 (1973); https://doi.org/SPHJAR
    III Vavilov Conference on Nonlinear Optics, Novosibirsk, June 1973.

  22. 22. G. A. Askaryan, V. A. Namiot, M. S. Rabinovich, Sov. Phys.‐JETP Lett. 17, 424 (1973).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  23. 23. F. Winterberg, Proc. 3rd RPI Workshop Conference on Laser/Plasma Interaction, August 1973 (H. Schwarz, ed.) Plenum, New York (1974).

  24. 24. Yu. Il’inskii, R. V. Khokhlov, Sov. Phys.‐Uspekhi 16, Jan.–Feb. 1974.https://doi.org/SOPUAP

  25. 25. V. I. Goldanskii, S. V. Karyagin, V. A. Namiot, Sov. Phys.‐JETP Lett. 19, 324 (1974).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  26. 26. Yu. Kagan, Sov. Phys.‐JETP Lett. 19, 373 (1974).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  27. 27. R. V. Pound, G. A. Rebka, Jr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 274 (1960); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    B. D. Josephson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 341 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  28. 28. Yu. Kagan, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 47, 366 (1964).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  29. 29. U. Haeberlen, J. S. Waugh, Phys. Rev. 175, 453 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  30. 30. W. K. Rhim, D. D. Elleman, R. W. Vaughan, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 3740 (1973).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  31. 31. G. Bizina, A. Beda, N. Burgov, A. Davydov, Sov. Phys.‐JETP 18, 973 (1964).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  32. 32. H. G. Dehmelt, Am. J. Phys. 22, 110 (1954).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  33. 33. O. C. Kistner, A. W. Sunyar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 412 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  34. 34. J. Nuckolls, L. Wood, A. Thiessen, G. Zimmermann, Nature 239, 139 (1972).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  35. 35. G. C. Baldwin, Laser Focus, March 1974, page 43.

  36. 36. V. I. Goldanskii, Yu. Kagan, V. A. Namiot, Sov. Phys.‐JETP Lett. 18, 34 (1973).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  37. 37. A. C. Melissinos, S. P. Davis, Phys. Rev. 115, 130 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  38. 38. R. V. Ambartzumian, V. S. Letokhov, IEEE Jour. Quant. Elect. QE‐7, 305 (1974); https://doi.org/IEJQA7
    R. V. Ambartzumian, V. S. Letokhov, Appl. Optics 11, 354 (1972).https://doi.org/APOPAI

  39. 39. V. S. Letokhov, Science 114, 4 (1973).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  40. 40. PHYSICS TODAY, September 1974, page 17.

  41. 41. C. A. Mead, Phys. Rev. 143, 990 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

More about the Authors

G. C. Baldwin. Professor of Nuclear Engineering and Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y..

R. V. Khokhlov. Professor of Physics, Moscow State University.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1975_02.jpeg

Volume 28, Number 2

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.