Discover
/
Article

Popular and Unpopular Ideas in Particle Physics

DEC 01, 1986
As particle physics becomes a deeper but more difficult field, there is too much emphasis on fashionable ideas and the search for anomalies, and too little reward for improving accelerators and detectors.
Martin L. Perl

I finished writing this article while the 23rd International Conference on High‐Energy Physics was taking place in Berkeley. California. It was a wellorganized conference with a variety of theoretical talks, comprehensive plenary lectures and many reports on new experiments. Yet the atmosphere of the conference could be summed up in one word: waiting. The participants knew that no major experimental or theoretical advance in particle physics was to be announced at this conference. They listened to the experimental and theoretical results, but they were prepared to wait until the next conference for a breakthrough.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. For a review of all models see F. J. Gilman, SLAC Publication No. 3898, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, Calif. (1986), submitted to Commun. Nucl. Part. Phys.

  2. 2. G. D. Rochester, C. C. Butler, Nature 160, 855 (1947).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  3. 3. R. Brown, U. Camerini, P. H. Fowler, H. Muirhead, C. F. Powell, D. M. Ritson, Nature 163, 82 (1949).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  4. 4. M. L. Perl, New Scientist, 2 January 1986, p. 24.

  5. 5. For a discussion of the sociological aspects of the increase in the size of particle‐physics experiments, see A. R. Pickering, W. P. Trower, Nature 318, 243 (1985).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  6. 6. M. L. Perl, G. S. Abrams, A. M. Boyarski, M. Breidenbach, D. D. Briggs, F. Bulos, W. Chinowsky, J. T. Dakin, G. J. Feldman, C. E. Friedberg, D. Fryberger, G. Goldhaber, G. Hanson, F. B. Heile, B. Jean‐Marie, J. A. Kadyk, R. R. Larsen, A. M. Litke, D. Lüke, B. A. Lulu, V. Lüth, D. Lyon, C. C. Morehouse, J. M. Paterson, F. M. Pierre, T. P. Pun, P. A. Rapidis, B. Richter, B. Sadoulet, R. F. Schwitters, W. Tanenbaum, G. H. Trilling, F. Vannucci, J. S. Whitaker, F. C. Winkelmann, J. E. Wiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1489 (1975).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  7. 7. C. Sutton, The Particle Connection, Simon and Schuster, New York (1984), chap. 10.

  8. 8. Nobel Lectures: Physics. 1942–1962, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1964), p. 530.

  9. 9. B. Richter, in Laser Acceleration of Particles, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas, eds., AIP, New York (1985), p. 8.

More about the authors

Martin L. Perl, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California.

Related content
/
Article
A half century after the discovery of Hawking radiation, we are still dealing with the quantum puzzle it exposed.
/
Article
Since the discovery was first reported in 1999, researchers have uncovered many aspects of the chiral-induced spin selectivity effect, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
/
Article
Metrologists are using fundamental physics to define units of measure. Now NIST has developed new quantum sensors to measure and realize the pascal.
/
Article
Nanoscale, topologically protected whirlpools of spins have the potential to move from applications in spintronics into quantum science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1986_12.jpeg

Volume 39, Number 12

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.