Physical Review Records the Birth of the Laser Era

Nicolaas Bloembergen

doi:10.1063/1.881380

Features

/

Article

Physical Review Records the Birth of the Laser Era

OCT 01, 1993

The first paper reporting an operating laser was rejected by Physical Review Letters in 1960. Now lasers are a huge and growing industry, but the pioneers’ chief motivation was the physics.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881380

Nicolaas Bloembergen

The historical development of masers and lasers has been well documented in several books. It is not my purpose here to recapitulate or improve on those accounts, which focus on the roles individual scientists, industry and funding agencies played in the evolution of the laser.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. J. L. Bromberg, The Laser in America, 1950–1970, MIT P., Cambridge, Mass. (1991).
M. Bertolotti, Masers and Lasers: A Historical Approach, Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK (1983).
J. Hecht, Laser Pioneer Interviews, High Tech Publications, Torrance, Calif. (1985).
2. J. P. Gordon, H. J. Zeiger, C. H. Townes, Phys. Rev. 95, 282 (1954).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
3. J. P. Gordon, H. J. Zeiger, C. H. Townes, Phys. Rev. 99, 1164 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
4. F. Bloch, Phys. Rev. 70, 450 (1946). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
F. Bloch, W. W. Hansen, M. Packard, Phys. Rev. 70, 474 (1946).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
5. E. M. Purcell, R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 81, 279 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
6. See, for example, H. Y. Carr, E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 94, 630 (1954).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
7. N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. 104, 205 (1956).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
8. H. E. D. Scovil, G. Feher, H. Seidel, Phys. Rev. 105, 209 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
9. G. Klauminzer, Laser Focus, May 1983, p. 8.
10. A. L. Schawlow, C. H. Townes, Phys. Rev. 112, 1940 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
11. S. A. Goudsmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 125 (1959).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. T. H. Maiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 565 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
13. T. H. Maiman, Nature 187, 493 (1960).https://doi.org/NATUAS
14. T. H. Maiman, Phys. Rev. 123, 1145 (1961). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
T. H. Maiman, R. H. Hoskins, I. J. d’Haenens, C. K. Asawa, V. Evtuhov, Phys. Rev. 123, 1151 (1961).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
15. R. J. Collins, D. F. Nelson, A. L. Schawlow, W. Bond, G. C. B. Garrett, W. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 303 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. P. P. Sorokin, M. J. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 557 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
17. A. Javan, W. R. BennetJr, D. R. Herriott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 106 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
18. A. Javan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 87 (1959).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
19. P. A. Franken, A. E. Hill, C. W. Peters, G. Weinrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 118 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
20. R. N. Hall, G. E. Fenner, J. D. Kingsley, T. J. Soltys, R. O. Carlson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 366 (1962).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the authors

Nicolaas Bloembergen, Harvard University.