Discover
/
Article

New Magnetic Superconductors: A Toy Box for Solid‐State Physicists

OCT 01, 1998
Rare earth nickel borocarbide compounds are rekindling interest in the decades‐old question of how superconductivity and magnetism coexist, and some remarkable answers are emerging.
Paul C. Canfield
Peter L. Gammel
David J. Bishop

Over the past decade, discussion of the interaction between superconductivity and magnetism has been overshadowed by the omnipresence of the oxide‐based, high‐temperature superconductors. But interest in the interaction between these two generally competing effects has a history that predates high‐Tc materials by several decades. Starting with seminal work by Bernd Matthias and his coworkers, it was found that magnetic impurities strongly suppress superconductivity in pure elements and binary compounds. This rapid suppression of the superconducting transition temperature Tc was due to the local magnetic moment of the impurity preventing the formation of the spin‐up/spin‐down conduction‐electron pairs that are responsible for superconductivity. The early measurements were made on dilute alloys, and for many solid‐state physicists of the time, the quest was to find compounds in which superconductivity coexists with an ordered lattice of local magnetic moments.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. For reviews, see the following: K. Buschow, E. Wohlfarth, eds., Ferromagnetic Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990),
    chap. 6. M. B. Maple, O. Fisher, eds., Superconductivity in Ternary Compounds II, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1982).

  2. 2. R. J. Cava et al., Nature 367, 146 (1994). https://doi.org/NATUAS
    R. J. Cava et al., Nature 367, 252 (1994). https://doi.org/NATUAS
    T. Siegrist et al., Nature 367, 254 (1994).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  3. 3. V. G. Kogan et al., Phys. Rev. B 55, R8693 (1997). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    V. G. Kogan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 741 (1997).

  4. 4. P. Dervenagas et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 8506 (1996). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    C. Stassis et al., Phys. Rev. B 55, R8678 (1997). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    M. Bullock et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, 7916 (1998).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  5. 5. U. Yaron et al., Nature 382, 236 (1996). https://doi.org/NATUAS
    M. R. Eskildsen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1968 (1997). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    D. McK. Paul et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1517 (1998). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    M. R. Eskildsen et al., Nature 393, 242 (1998).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  6. 6. A. Yatskar et al.Phys. Rev. B 54, R3772 (1996). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    S. Kdharef et al.Solid State Commun. 98, 985 (1996). https://doi.org/SSCOA4
    S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. Yatskar, W. P. Beyermann, Physica B 230‐32, 859 (1997).
    R. Sala, F. Borsa, E. Lee, P. C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. B 56, 6195 (1997).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  7. 7. P. C. Canfield et al., Phys. Rev. B 55, 970 (1997). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    P. C. Canfield, L. Bud’ko, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 262‐63, 169 (1997).
    P. C. Canfield, S. L. Bud’ko, B. K. Cho, Physica C 262, 249 (1996).https://doi.org/PHYCE6

  8. 8. C. Mazumdar et al., Solid State Commun. 87, 413 (1993).https://doi.org/SSCOA4

  9. 9. R. Nagarajan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 274 (1994).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  10. 10. L. F. Mattheiss, Phys. Rev. B 49, 13, 279 (1994). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    W. E. Pickett, D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3702 (1994). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    J. Y. Rhee, X. Wang, B. N. Harmon, Phys. Rev. B 51, 15, 585 (1995).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  11. 11. B. K. Cho, P. C. Canfield, D. C. Johnston, Phys. Rev. B 52, R3844 (1995). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    C. V. Tomy et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 9186 (1995).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  12. 12. B. K. Cho, P. C. Canfield, D. C. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 163 (1996).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  13. 13. B. K. Chor et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 3676 (1995). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    B. K. Cho et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 3684 (1995).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  14. 14. T. V. Ramakrishnan, C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 24, 137 (1981).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  15. 15. Y. De Wilde et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4273 (1997).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  16. 16. K. O. Cheon et al., Phys. Rev. B 58, 6463 (1998).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  17. 17. P. C. Canfield et al., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 5800 (1991). https://doi.org/JAPIAU
    Z. Fisk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3310 (1991).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the authors

Paul C. Canfield, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

Peter L. Gammel, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New jersey.

David J. Bishop, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New jersey.

Related content
/
Article
A half century after the discovery of Hawking radiation, we are still dealing with the quantum puzzle it exposed.
/
Article
Since the discovery was first reported in 1999, researchers have uncovered many aspects of the chiral-induced spin selectivity effect, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
/
Article
Metrologists are using fundamental physics to define units of measure. Now NIST has developed new quantum sensors to measure and realize the pascal.
/
Article
Nanoscale, topologically protected whirlpools of spins have the potential to move from applications in spintronics into quantum science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1998_10.jpeg

Volume 51, Number 10

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.