/
Article

Must we always be gadgeteers?

DEC 01, 1950
Philip M. Morse

As far as this writer can discover, the typical response of the physicist who wished to contribute to this latest international crisis has been to go to Los Alamos, or some other government laboratory for weapon development, for a summer or a year. No doubt this has been a valuable contribution to solving the present crisis and no doubt it has made the contributor feel he is “doing his bit”. But is this all the physicist can contribute, the development of more and fancier weapons? Is the only contribution of physics, to the year‐by‐year needs of this country, to be more and fancier gadgets?

This article is only available in PDF format

Related content
/
Article
At the end of the turbulent 1960s, the postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt. The lessons learned then may be helpful to today’s physicists.
/
Article
Interviews with 22 successful early-career physical scientists and engineers reveal that networking has been one of the most critical ways to nurture their careers.
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1950_12.jpeg

Volume 3, Number 12

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.