/
Article

Must we always be gadgeteers?

DEC 01, 1950
Philip M. Morse

As far as this writer can discover, the typical response of the physicist who wished to contribute to this latest international crisis has been to go to Los Alamos, or some other government laboratory for weapon development, for a summer or a year. No doubt this has been a valuable contribution to solving the present crisis and no doubt it has made the contributor feel he is “doing his bit”. But is this all the physicist can contribute, the development of more and fancier weapons? Is the only contribution of physics, to the year‐by‐year needs of this country, to be more and fancier gadgets?

This article is only available in PDF format

Related content
/
Article
To go beyond classical models and tie our understanding of gravity to the quantum world, experiments are needed.
/
Article
The first African American physicist to earn a PhD made the best of a difficult career path.
/
Article
Apprehension about career pathways and research funding dominated the list of concerns expressed by physics and astronomy undergraduates in a recent survey.
/
Article
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1950_12.jpeg

Volume 3, Number 12

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.