/
Article

Mathematics at NBS…a policy committee report

SEP 01, 1956
The following is taken from a report of the Policy Committee for Mathematics, one of the Technical Advisory Committees to the National Bureau of Standards established in response to recommendations of the 1953 ad hoc committee (“the Kelly Committee”) which was asked to evaluate the Bureau’s functions and operations in relation to the national needs. Part of the duty of the Policy Committee is to report to the Director of NBS on the operation of the Bureau’s Mathematics Division, which includes the Numerical Analysis Section, the Computation Laboratory, the Statistical Engineering Laboratory, and the Mathematical Physics Section, and part of it is to keep mathematicians and physicists aware of the Bureau’s activities in the area of mathematics and in touch with its needs and problems. Committee members are: Mina Rees (Chairman), David Blackwell, E. U. Condon, Mark Kac, Philip M. Morse, A. H. Taub. They were nominated by the mathematical societies and by the Physical Society. Their report to NBS Director A. V. Astin was submitted on March 15, 1956.
Mina Rees

At the time of the establishment of the Bureau of Standards Technical Advisory Committee for Mathematics a discussion of the role appropriate to the Mathematics Division (Division 11) of the Bureau was undertaken by the Committee. Although the excellence of the Bureau’s staff in the mathematical areas in which it had been operating was striking, adequate mathematical consultant services to other Bureau activities seemed to require the establishment and development of a section on mathematical physics. Therefore the Technical Advisory Committee recommended the establishment of a new section. There are now four sections: Numerical Analysis (11.01), the Computation Laboratory (11.02), the Statistical Engineering Laboratory (11.03), and Mathematical Physics (11.04).

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Mina Rees, Chairperson, Policy Committee for Mathematics, National Bureau of Standards.

Related content
/
Article
At the end of the turbulent 1960s, the postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt. The lessons learned then may be helpful to today’s physicists.
/
Article
Interviews with 22 successful early-career physical scientists and engineers reveal that networking has been one of the most critical ways to nurture their careers.
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1956_09.jpeg

Volume 9, Number 9

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.