Discover
/
Article

Macroscopic quantum phenomena from pairing in superconductors

JUL 01, 1973
“…the development of the theory of superconductivity was truly a collaborative effort, involving not only John Bardeen, Leon Cooper and myself, but also a host of outstanding scientists working over a period of half a century.”
J. Robert Schrieffer

It gives me great pleasure to have the opportunity to join my colleagues John Bardeen and Leon Cooper in discussing with you the theory of superconductivity. Since the discovery of superconductivity by H. Kamerlingh Onnes in 1911, an enormous effort has been devoted by a spectrum of outstanding scientists to understanding this phenomenon. As in most developments in our branch of science, the accomplishments honored by this Nobel prize were made possible by a large number of developments preceding them. A general understanding of these developments is important as a backdrop for our own contribution.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. H. Kamerlingh Onnes, Nobel Lectures, Volume I, pages 306–336.

  2. 2. W. Meissner, R. Ochsenfeld, Naturwiss. 21, 787 (1933).https://doi.org/NATWAY

  3. 3. C. J. Gorter, H. B. G. Casimir, Phys. Z. 35, 963 (1934); https://doi.org/PHZTAO
    C. J. Gorter, H. B. G. Casimir, Z. Techn. Phys. 15, 539 (1934).

  4. 4. F. London, [a] Phys. Rev. 24, 562 (1948); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    [b] Superfluids, Volume I, Wiley, New York, (1950).

  5. 5. V. L. Ginzburg, L. D. Landau, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 20, 1064 (1950).

  6. 6. E. Maxwell, Phys. Rev. 78, 477 (1950); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    C. A. Reynolds, B. Serin, W. H. Wright, L. B. Nesbitt, Phys. Rev. 78, 487 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  7. 7. H. Frohlich, Phys. Rev. 79, 845 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  8. 8. J. Bardeen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 23, 261 (1951).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  9. 9. A. B. Pippard, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A216, 547 (1953).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  10. 10. J. Bardeen, [a] Phys. Rev. 97, 1724 (1955); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    [b] Encyclopedia of Physics, Volume 15, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1956), page 274.

  11. 11. L. D. Landau, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 30 (3), 1058 (920) (1956);
    L. D. Landau, 32 (5), 59 (101) (1957).

  12. 12. L. N. Cooper, Phys. Rev. 104, 1189 (1956).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  13. 13. B. S. Deaver, Jr, W. M. Fairbank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 43 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  14. 14. R. Doll, M. Näbauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 51 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  15. 15. N. Beyers, C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 46 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  16. 16. V. L. Ginzburg, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 48, 25 (1952); https://doi.org/UFNAAG
    V. L. Ginzburg, transl. Fortsch. d. Phys. 1, 101 (1953).

  17. 17. M. R. Schafroth, Phys. Rev. 96, 1442 (1954); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    M. R. Schafroth, 100, 463 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  18. 18. M. R. Schafroth, J. M. Blatt, S. T. Butler, Helv. Phys. Acta 30, 93 (1957).https://doi.org/HPACAK

  19. 19. I. Giaever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 147 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  20. 20. B. D. Josephson, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962); https://doi.org/PHLTAM
    B. D. Josephson, Advan. Phys. 14, 419 (1965).https://doi.org/ADPHAH

  21. 21. P. W. Anderson, in Lectures on the Many‐Body Problem, E. R. Caianiello, ed., Academic, New York (1964), Volume II.

  22. 22. See Superconductivity, R. D. Parks, ed., Dekker, New York (1969).

  23. 23. See, for example, W. H. Parker, B. N. Taylor, D. N. Langenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 287 (1967); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    T. F. Finnegan, A. Denenstein, D. N. Langenberg, Phys. Rev. B4, 1487 (1971).https://doi.org/PLRBAQ

More about the authors

J. Robert Schrieffer, Mary Amanda Wood Professor of Physics, University of Pennsylvania.

In These Collections
Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1973_07.jpeg

Volume 26, Number 7

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.