Discover
/
Article

Isobaric analog resonances

APR 01, 1969
These highly excited compound nuclear states, observed in proton scattering from heavy nuclei, have useful applications in nuclear spectroscopy.
W. Rory Coker
C. Fred Moore

WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS, exploitation of isobaric analog resonances to obtain detailed information concerning the structure of atomic nuclei has become a standard, if somewhat mysterious, technique in the repertoire of experimental nuclear physicists. The precise nature and structure of isobaric analog resonances in nuclei are apparently not well understood by anyone at the present time, because the nuclear configurations involved are exceedingly complicated. Fortunately, however, it is easy to understand many of the properties of analog resonances that make them valuable to experimentalists and a topic of lively interest and sometimes controversy among students of nuclear structure.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. W. Heisenberg, Z. Physik 77, 1 (1932).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  2. 2. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 51, 106, 947 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 56, 519 (1939).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. D. H. Wilkinson, Phil. Mag. 1, 379 (1956).https://doi.org/PHMAA4

  5. 5. J. D. Anderson, C. Wong, J. W. McClure, Phys. Rev. 126, 2170 (1962).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. A. M. Lane, Nucl. Phys. 35, 676 (1962).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  7. 7. A. M. Lane, J. M. Soper, Nucl. Phys. 37, 663 (1962).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  8. 8. J. D. Fox, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 198 (1964).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  9. 9. D. Robson, Phys. Rev. 137, B535 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. P. Richard, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 343 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    G. A. Keyworth, et al., Phys. Letters 20, 281 (1966).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  11. 11. W. MacDonald, A. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. 160, 730 (1967); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    C. Mahaux, H. A. Weidenmüller, Nucl. Phys. 89, 33 (1966) https://doi.org/NUPHA7
    and C. Mahaux, H. A. Weidenmüller, A94, 1 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPHA7 , Nucl. Phys.
    R. O. Stephen, Nucl. Phys. A94, 192 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
    T. Tamura (to be published);
    S. A. A. Zaidi (to be published).

  12. 12. G. A. Jones, A. M. Lane, G. C. Morrison, Phys. Letters 11, 329 (1964).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  13. 13. G. Hardie, et al., Phys. Rev. 129, 353 (1963), https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    and see also G. Hardie, et al., PHYSICS TODAY 20, no. 12, 63 (1967).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

More about the Authors

W. Rory Coker. Nuclear Studies, University of Texas.

C. Fred Moore. Nuclear Studies, University of Texas.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_04.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 4

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.