/
Article

Isobaric analog resonances

APR 01, 1969
These highly excited compound nuclear states, observed in proton scattering from heavy nuclei, have useful applications in nuclear spectroscopy.
W. Rory Coker
C. Fred Moore

WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS, exploitation of isobaric analog resonances to obtain detailed information concerning the structure of atomic nuclei has become a standard, if somewhat mysterious, technique in the repertoire of experimental nuclear physicists. The precise nature and structure of isobaric analog resonances in nuclei are apparently not well understood by anyone at the present time, because the nuclear configurations involved are exceedingly complicated. Fortunately, however, it is easy to understand many of the properties of analog resonances that make them valuable to experimentalists and a topic of lively interest and sometimes controversy among students of nuclear structure.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. W. Heisenberg, Z. Physik 77, 1 (1932).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  2. 2. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 51, 106, 947 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 56, 519 (1939).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. D. H. Wilkinson, Phil. Mag. 1, 379 (1956).https://doi.org/PHMAA4

  5. 5. J. D. Anderson, C. Wong, J. W. McClure, Phys. Rev. 126, 2170 (1962).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. A. M. Lane, Nucl. Phys. 35, 676 (1962).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  7. 7. A. M. Lane, J. M. Soper, Nucl. Phys. 37, 663 (1962).https://doi.org/NUPHA7

  8. 8. J. D. Fox, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 198 (1964).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  9. 9. D. Robson, Phys. Rev. 137, B535 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. P. Richard, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 343 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    G. A. Keyworth, et al., Phys. Letters 20, 281 (1966).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  11. 11. W. MacDonald, A. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. 160, 730 (1967); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    C. Mahaux, H. A. Weidenmüller, Nucl. Phys. 89, 33 (1966) https://doi.org/NUPHA7
    and C. Mahaux, H. A. Weidenmüller, A94, 1 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPHA7 , Nucl. Phys.
    R. O. Stephen, Nucl. Phys. A94, 192 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
    T. Tamura (to be published);
    S. A. A. Zaidi (to be published).

  12. 12. G. A. Jones, A. M. Lane, G. C. Morrison, Phys. Letters 11, 329 (1964).https://doi.org/PHLTAM

  13. 13. G. Hardie, et al., Phys. Rev. 129, 353 (1963), https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    and see also G. Hardie, et al., PHYSICS TODAY 20, no. 12, 63 (1967).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

More about the authors

W. Rory Coker, Nuclear Studies, University of Texas.

C. Fred Moore, Nuclear Studies, University of Texas.

Related content
/
Article
At the end of the turbulent 1960s, the postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt. The lessons learned then may be helpful to today’s physicists.
/
Article
Interviews with 22 successful early-career physical scientists and engineers reveal that networking has been one of the most critical ways to nurture their careers.
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_04.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 4

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.