Interference and Radioastronomy

NOV 01, 1991

The radioastronomer’s struggle against a growing flood of interfering sources, from garage door openers to digital audio broadcast satellites, must be fought in the technical and political arenas.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881297

A. Richard Thompson

Tomas E. Gergely

Paul A. Vanden Bout

Radioastronomy began in 1933 with Karl Jansky’s accidental discovery of radio emission from the center of the Galaxy as he was studying the effect of thunderstorms on transatlantic telecommunications. Six decades later, telecommunications and other radio services are threatening the future of radioastronomy. Whether searching for the signature of a protogalaxy, studying the maseremission signposts of star formation or pursuing answers to any of the myriad questions of modern astrophysics, today’s radioastronomer is often frustrated by man‐made radio interference. From satellites, radar, radio and television transmitters, and wireless personal communication systems of all sorts to microwave ovens, computers and even garage door openers, the same technology that lets us study the universe at radio wavelengths is producing a flood of man‐made signals. Figure 1 illustrates how noisy the radio spectrum has become at wavelengths around 1 meter. (The remedy offered in the figure is, alas, just an astronomer’s fantasy.)

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. Natl. Telecommun. Inf. Agency, “US Spectrum Management Policy; Agenda for the Future,” special publ. 91‐23, NTIA, Washington, D.C. (1990).
2. K. M. Menten, to appear in Astrophys. J. Lett. (1991).
3. J. M. Uson, D. S. Bagri, T. S. Cornwell, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. (1991).
4. P. R. McCullough, C. Heiles, A. E. Glassgold, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 23, 933 (1991).https://doi.org/AASBAR
5. P. J. Daly, J. Navigation 41, 186 (1988).
6. M. C. Cudak, G. W. SwensonJr, W. W. Cochran, Radio Sci. 26, 773 (1991).https://doi.org/RASCAD
7. W. A. Sizemore, in Light Pollution, Radio Interference and Space Debris, conf. ser. 17, D. L. Crawford, ed., Astron. Soc. Pacif., San Francisco (1991), p. 176.
8. P. J. Napier, A. R. Thompson, R. D. Ekers, Proc. IEEE 71, 1295 (1983).https://doi.org/IEEPAD
9. A. R. Thompson, J. M. Moran, G. W. Swenson Jr, Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, Wiley, New York (1986), and Kreiger, Malabar, Fla. (1991), ch. 14.
10. See, for example, Int. Radio Consultative Comm., Recommendations of the CCIR, vol. II, and Reports of the CCIR, annex to vol. II, Int. Telecommun. Union, Geneva (1990).
11. V. Pankonin, R. M. Price, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compatibility 23, 308 (1981).
12. J. H. Taylor, M. Davis, eds., Scientific Benefits of an Upgraded Arecibo Telescope, Proc. Wksp., Cornell U., October 1986, Natl. Astron. Ionosphere Center, Arecibo, Puerto Rico (1987).

More about the Authors

A. Richard Thompson. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Tomas E. Gergely. Astronomy Division, National Science Foundation.

Paul A. Vanden Bout. NRAO.