Discover
/
Article

Hideki Yukawa and the Meson Theory

DEC 01, 1986
Some 50 years ago, in his first research contribution, a young Japanese theoretical physicist explained the strong, short‐range force between neutrons and protons as due to an exchange of “heavy quanta.”
Laurie M. Brown

A little over 50 years ago, Hideki Yukawa, a young Japanese theoretical physicist at the University of Osaka, proposed a fundamental theory of nuclear forces involving the exchange of massive charged particles between neutrons and protons. He called the exchanged particles “heavy quanta” to distinguish them from the light quanta of the electromagnetic field, but now they are known as pions, the lightest members of a large family of particles called mesons. These days, the meson theory seems to be a straightforward application of quantum field theory to the nuclear forces, but it could not have appeared so 50 years ago. Otherwise it would not have been invented by an obscure, unpublished Japanese physicist who had never even traveled abroad, but instead by one of the many Western physicists, some of them of great reputation, who were working on the theory of nuclear forces. Furthermore, Yukawa’s paper was totally neglected for more than two years, although it was written in lucid English and published in a respected journal of rather wide circulation. The meson theory has turned out to be an important paradigm for the theory of elementary particles, as seminal as Ernest O. Lawrence’s cyclotron has been for its experimental practice. In this article I will trace the intellectual trail Yukawa followed to arrive at his theory, using unpublished documents that have recently been discovered among Yukawa’s papers at Kyoto University. (These documents have been organized and cataloged in the Yukawa Hall Archival Library, and I am grateful to Rokuo Kawabe and Michiji Konuma for translations and comments.)

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys.‐Math. Soc. Jpn. 17, 48 (1935).https://doi.org/PPMJAJ

  2. 2. E. P. Wigner, in Nuclear Physics in Retrospect, R. Stuewer, ed., U. of Minnesota P., Minneapolis (1979), p. 160.

  3. 3. G. Gamow, Constitution of Atomic Nuclei and Radioactivity, Oxford U.P., Oxford (1931).

  4. 4. J. Chadwick, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 136, 692 (1932).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  5. 5. W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 77, 1 (1932); https://doi.org/ZEPYAA
    W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 78, 156 (1932); https://doi.org/ZEPYAA
    W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 80, 587 (1933).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  6. 6. D. Iwanenko, Nature 129, 1312 (1932).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  7. 7. L. M. Brown, D. Moyer, Am. J. Phys. 52, 130 (1984).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  8. 8. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 43, 252 (1933).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  9. 9. H. Yukawa, Tabibito (The Traveler), L. M. Brown, R. Yoshida, trans., World Scientific, Singapore (1982).

  10. 10. E. Fermi, Nature 125, 16 (1930); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 60, 320 (1930).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  11. 11. W. Heisenberg, W. Pauli, Z. Phys. 47, 1 (1929).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  12. 12. Document E05 030 U01, Yukawa Hall Archival Library, Kyoto University.

  13. 13. H. Yukawa, J. Phys.‐Math. Soc. Jpn. 7, 195 (1933).

  14. 14. Document E05 060 U01, Yukawa Hall Archival Library, Kyoto University.

  15. 15. H. Yukawa, Bull. Phys.‐Math. Soc. Jpn. 7, 131A (1933).

  16. 16. See, for example, L. M. Brown, PHYSICS TODAY, September 1978, p. 23.

  17. 17. E. Fermi, Ric. Sci. 4 (2), 491 (1933);
    E. Fermi, Nuovo Cimento 2, 1 (1934); https://doi.org/NUCIAD
    E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 88, 161 (1933).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  18. 18. I. Tamm, Nature 133, 981 (1934). https://doi.org/NATUAS
    D. Iwanenko, Nature 133, 981.

  19. 19. G. C. Wick, Nature 142, 994 (1938).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  20. 20. H. J. Bhabha, Nature 141, 117 (1938).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  21. 21. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys.‐Math. Soc. Jpn. 19, 712 (1937).https://doi.org/PPMJAJ

  22. 22. S. H. Neddermeyer, C. D. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 51, 884 (1937). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. C. Street, E. C. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. 51, 1005 (1937). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    Y. Nishina, M. Takeuchi, T. Ichimiya, Phys. Rev. 52, 1198 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  23. 23. J. R. Oppenheimer, R. Serber, Phys. Rev. 51, 1113 (1937). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Phys. Rev. 52, 41 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  24. 24. Document E02 130 P12, Yukawa Hall Archival Library, Kyoto University.

  25. 25. See N. Kemmer, Biog. Mem. Fellows R. Soc. 29, 661 (1938).

More about the authors

Laurie M. Brown, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Related content
/
Article
The ability to communicate a key message clearly and concisely to a nonspecialized audience is a critical skill to develop at all educational levels.
/
Article
With strong magnetic fields and intense lasers or pulsed electric currents, physicists can reconstruct the conditions inside astrophysical objects and create nuclear-fusion reactors.
/
Article
A crude device for quantification shows how diverse aspects of distantly related organisms reflect the interplay of the same underlying physical factors.
/
Article
Events held around the world have recognized the past, present, and future of quantum science and technology.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1986_12.jpeg

Volume 39, Number 12

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.