Experiments in magneto‐fluid dynamics

DEC 01, 1960

R. A. Alpher

Magneto‐fluid dynamics deals with the motion of electrically conducting gases and liquids in the presence of magnetic fields. The macroscopic description of such motions involves the coupling of the equations of hydrodynamics and Maxwell’s equations. For velocities small compared to that of light, and if one neglects displacement and charge convection currents, the coupling in the equations of motion occurs through a Lorentz body force term—a term involving the current density j and the magnetic induction, B, viz., $j \times B /c.$ The requirement of Lorentz invariance effects the introduction of the coupling into Maxwell’s equations, so that one calculates j from the generalized Ohm’s law $j = σ(E + V \times B /c),$ where σ is the fluid conductivity, E the electric field intensity and V the fluid velocity. Both $j \times B$ and $V \times B$ are basically nonlinear terms, whence the already uncomfortable situation with nonlinearities in hydrodynamics is quite considerably aggravated. Linearization on the one hand and “simple” experiments on the other must be invoked to convey a physical feeling for the phenomena to be expected from this coupling.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. M. Faraday, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 15, 125 (1832);
or M. Faraday, Experimental Researches in Electricity Vol. 1, p. 55, 1839.
2. W. Ritchie, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 15, 295 (1832).
3. E. F. Northrop, Phys. Rev. 24, 474 (1907).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
4. J. Larmor, Engineering (London) 108, 461 (1919).https://doi.org/ENGNA2
5. E. Williams, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 42, 466, 479 (1930).https://doi.org/PPSOAU
6. E. Williams, Phil. Mag. 50, 27 (1925); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
T. J. Jones, Phil. Mag. 50, 46 (1925).https://doi.org/PHMAA4
7. J. Hartmann, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.‐fys. Medd. 15, 6 (1937).https://doi.org/KDVSAK
8. J. Hartmann and F. Lazarus, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.‐fys. Medd. 15, 7 (1937).https://doi.org/KDVSAK
9. H. Alfven, Nature 150, 405 (1942).https://doi.org/NATUAS
10. S. Lundquist, Phys. Rev. 76, 1805 (1949).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
11. B. Lehnert, Phys. Rev. 94, 815 (1954).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
12. B. Lehnert and N. C. Little, Tellus 9, 97 (1957).https://doi.org/TELLAL
13. Y. Nakagawa, Proc. Roy. Soc. A249, 138 (1959).
14. R. A. Alpher, H. Hurwitz, Jr., R. H. Johnson, and D. R. White, Rev. Mod. Phys. 10, 758 (1960).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
15. B. Lehnert, Proc. Roy. Soc. A233, 299 (1955).
16. A. Dattner, B. Lehnert, and S. Lundquist, Proc. 2nd Int’l. Conf. on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 31, 325 (1958).
17. B. Lehnert, Rev. Mod. Phys. 10, 1013 (1960); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
B. Lehnert and G. Sjögren, J. Nucl. Energy Pt. C, 1, 121 (1960).https://doi.org/JNECAE
18. D. H. Birdsall, S. A. Colgate, and H. P. Furth, Proc. 4th Int’l. Conf. on Ionization Phenomena in Gases, Uppsala, 1959.
19. S. A. Colgate, H. P. Furth, and F. O. Halliday, Rev. Mod. Phys. 10, 744 (1960).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

More about the Authors

R. A. Alpher. General Electric Research Laboratory, Schenectady, N.Y..