Energy from Inertial Fusion

SEP 01, 1992

Progress in drivers, reactors and targets has made smaller, more flexible power plants feasible and has reduced the potential costs of developing them.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881319

William J. Hogan

Roger Bangerter

Gerald L. Kulcinski

Fusion is potentially a safe clean source not limited by political boundaries. Magnetic and inertial fusion share this promise, but there are differences between them. An inertial fusion power plant is based on different physics and technology from a magnetic fusion power plant and therefore presents somewhat different benefits and challenges. The facilities required to demonstrate inertial fusion power are potentially much smaller. In this article we describe concepts for such a power plant, its beneficial features and a low‐cost reactor test facility for developing practical fusion power.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. W. J. Hogan, W. R. Meier, in Proc. 11th Symp. Fusion Engineering, vol. 1, IEEE, New York (1985), p. 139;
Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. publ. UCRL‐92559, Livermore, Calif. (1985).
2. W. F. Krupke, Fusion Technol. 15, 377 (1989).https://doi.org/FUSTE8
3. Natl. Acad. of Sci., “Second Review of the Department of Energy’s Inertial Confinement Fusion Program,” final report, Natl. Acad. P., Washington, D.C. (September 1990).
4. W. R. Meier et al., W. J. Schafer Associates, “Osiris and Sombrero Inertial Fusion Power Plant Designs,” draft, 9 March 1992 (to be published).
I. N. Sviatoslavsky et al., Fusion Technol. 21, 1470 (1992). https://doi.org/FUSTE8
R. F. Bourque, M. J. Monsler, W. R. Meier, Fusion Technol. 21, 1465 (1992).https://doi.org/FUSTE8
5. L. M. Waganer et al., McDonnell Douglas Missile Systems Co., St. Louis, “Inertial Fusion Energy Reactor Design Studies Final Report,” (March 1992), to be published.
6. G. L. Kulcinski et al., J. Fusion Energy 10, 339 (1991).https://doi.org/JFENDS
7. Fusion Policy Advisory Committee Final Report, DOE/S‐0081, Department of Energy, Washington, DC (September 1990).
8. J. J. Barnard, A. L. Brooks, F. Coffield, F. Deadrick, L. V. Griffith, H. C. Kirbie, V. K. Neil, M. A. Newton, A. C. Paul, L. L. Reginato, W. M. Sharpo, J. Wilson, S. S. Yu, D. L. Judd, “Study of Recirculating Induction Accelerators as Drivers for Heavy Ion Fusion,” pub. UCRL‐LR‐108095, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab., Livermore, Calif. (1992).
9. S. Eylon, E. R. Colby, T. J. Fessenden, T. Garvey, K. Hahn, E. Henestroza, Particle Accel. 37‐38, 235 (1992).
10. C. D. Orth, Fusion Technol. 10, 1245 (1986).https://doi.org/FUSTE8
11. W. J. Hogan, G. L. Kulcinski, Fusion Technol. 8, 717 (1985).https://doi.org/FUSTE8
12. J. H. Pitts, “The Cascade Inertial Confinement Fusion Reactor Concept,” pub. UCRL‐LR 104546, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab., Livermore, Calif. (13 December 1990).
13. National Energy Strategy, First Edition 1991/1992, Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. (February 1991).
14. W. J. Hogan, in Proc. 14th IEEE/NPSS Symp. Fusion Engineering, vol. 1, IEEE, New York (1991), p. 227;
pub. UCRL‐JC‐108087, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab., Livermore, Calif. (1991).

More about the Authors

William J. Hogan. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.

Roger Bangerter. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California.

Gerald L. Kulcinski. Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison.