Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical

OCT 01, 1991

The environment surrounding a quantum system can, in effect, monitor some of the system’s observobles. As a result, the eigenstates of those observables continuously decohere and can behave like classical states.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881293

Wojciech H. Zurek

Quantum mechanics works exceedingly well in all practical applications. No example of conflict between its predictions and experiment is known. Without quantum physics we could not explain the behavior of solids, the structure and function of DNA, the color of the stars, the action of lasers or the properties of superfluids. Yet well over half a century after its inception, the debate about the relation of quantum mechanics to the familiar physical world continues. How can a theory that can account ith precision for everything we can measure still be deemed lacking?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. N. Bohr, Nature 121, 580 (1928); reprinted in ref. 2.https://doi.org/NATUAS
2. J. A. Wheeler, W. H. Zurek, eds., Quantum Theory and Measurements, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1983).
3. V. B. Braginsky, Y. I. Vorontsov, K. S. Thome, Science 209, 547 (1980); https://doi.org/SCIEAS
reprinted in ref. 2.C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drewer, V. D. Sandberg, M. Zimmerman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 341 (1980).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
4. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987). https://doi.org/RMPHAT
A. O. Caldeira, A. J. Leggett, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 149, 374 (1983). https://doi.org/APNYA6
C. D. Tesche, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 36 (1986).https://doi.org/ANYAA9
5. H. EverettIII, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957). https://doi.org/RMPHAT
J. A. Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 463 (1957).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
6. B. S. DeWitt, N. Graham, eds., The Many‐Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1973).
7. H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys. 1, 69 (1970); reprinted in ref. 2.https://doi.org/FNDPA4
8. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516 (1981); https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
W. H. Zurek, 26, 1862 (1982).
9. E. P. Wigner, in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and the Measurement Theory, P. Meystre, M. O. Scully, eds., Plenum, New York (1983), p. 43.
E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, Z. Phys. B 59, 223 (1985). https://doi.org/ZPCMDN
F. Haake, D. F. Walls, in Quantum Optics IV, J. D. Harvey, D. F. Walls, eds., Springer‐Verlag, New York (1986), p. 181.
G. J. Milburn, C. A. Holmes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2237 (1986). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
A. Albrecht, “Investigating Decoherence in a Simple System,” Fermilab preprint 91/101‐A (1991).
B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, Y. Zhang, “Quantum Brownian Motion in a General Environment,” U. Maryland preprint (1991).
10. M. Gell‐Mann, J. B. Hartle, in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, W. H. Zurek, ed., Addison‐Wesley, Redwood City, Calif. (1990), p. 425.
J. B. Hartle, in Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes, S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle, T. Piran, S. Weinberg, eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1991), p. 425.
11. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1932),
English trans, by R. T. Beyer, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1955);
partly reprinted in ref. 2.
12. E. P. Wigner, Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963),
contains the original design of the reversible Stern‐Gerlach apparatus. See M. O. Scully, B. G. Englert, J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1775 (1989), and references therein for recent discussion of the “one‐bit detector.”https://doi.org/AJPIAS
13. J. A. Wheeler, in Problems in Foundations of Physics, Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. “Enrico Fermi,” Course 72, N. Toraldo di Francia, ed., North Holland, Amsterdam (1979), p. 395.
14. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1951), ch. 22, sections 15–19; reprinted in ref. 2.
15. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 91 (1982). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).
17. R. P. Feynman, F. L. Vernon, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 24, 118 (1963).https://doi.org/APNYA6
18. H. Dekker, Phys. Rep. 80, 1 (1981).https://doi.org/PRPLCM
19. A. O. Caldeira, A. J. Leggett, Physica A 121, 587 (1983); https://doi.org/PHYADX
A. O. Caldeira, A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1057 (1985).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
20. W. H. Zurek, in Frontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics, P. Meystre, M. O. Scully, eds., Plenum, New York (1986), p. 145.
W. G. Unruh, W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1071 (1989).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
21. J. J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. D 39, 2912 (1989). https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
S. Habib, R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. D 42, 4056 (1990).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ
22. R. J. Griffiths, Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).
23. R. Omnés, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 201, 354, (1990).
24. E. P. Wigner, in The Scientist Speculates, I. J. Good, ed., Heineman, London (1961), p. 284; reprinted in ref. 2.

More about the Authors

Wojciech H. Zurek. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos.