/
Article

Computational synergetics

JUL 01, 1984
As a heuristic tool, used to explore complex dynamical behavior, computers allow us to discover unexpected linkages and new concepts in nonlinear systems.
Norman J. Zabusky

Computers, used in what I shall call the “heuristic mode,” can greatly enhance our understanding of the mathematics of nonlinear dynamical processes—a field that is taking on increasing importance as we explore the complex behavior that even simple systems often exhibit. As I shall try to show, computers allow us to penetrate into unexplored regions of mathematics and to discover unforeseen linkages among ideas.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. H. H. Goldstine, The Computer from Pascal to von Neumann, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N.J. (1972).

  2. 2. H. H. Goldstine, J. von Neumann, in Collected Works of John von Neumann, A. Taub, ed., MacMillan, New York, (1963), volume 5, page 1.
    Another formulation is in a 1949 paper. Collected Works, volume 6, page 437.

  3. 3. S. M. Ulam, A Collection of Mathematical Problems, Wiley–Interscience, New York (1960).

  4. 4. N. J. Zabusky, J. Comput. Phys. 43, 195 (1981). This comprehensive review paper contains an extensive bibliography of papers and monographs on computational synergetics.https://doi.org/JCTPAH

  5. 5. E. Fermi, J. R. Pasta, S. M. Ulam, Los Alamos Report LA‐1940, May 1955;
    reprinted in E. Fermi, Collected Works, U. Chicago, P. Chicago (1965), volume 2, page 978.

  6. 6. N. J. Zabusky, in Proc. Conf. Mathematical Models in the Physical Sciences, S. Drobot, ed., Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1963), page 99.

  7. 7. M. D. Kruskal, Proc. IBM Scientific Symposium—Large Scale Problems in Physics, 9–11 December 1963, IBM, Armonk, N.Y. (1965).

  8. 8. R. M. Miura, SIAM Rev. 18, 412 (1976). https://doi.org/SIREAD
    J. W. Miles, J. Fluid Mech. 106, 131 (1981).https://doi.org/JFLSA7

  9. 9. N. J. Zabusky, M. D. Kruskal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 240 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  10. 10. M. J. Ablowitz, H. Segur, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, SIAM Philadelphia (1981).

  11. 11. C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, R. M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. M. Toda, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 22, 431 (1967); https://doi.org/JUPSAU
    M. Toda, J. Phys. Soc. Japan Suppl 26, 235 (1969);
    M. Toda, Theory of Nonlinear Lattices, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1980) (Series in Solid State Sciences, volume 20).

  13. 13. N. J. Zabusky, in The Significance of Nonlinearity in the Natural Sciences, B. Kursunoglu, A. Perlmutter, L. F. Scott, eds., Plenum, New York (1977), page 145.

  14. 14. J. C. McWilliams, J. Fluid Mech., (1984) in press.

  15. 15. N. J. Zabusky, G. S. Deem, J. Fluid Mech. 47, 353 (1971).https://doi.org/JFLSA7

  16. 16. C.‐M. Ho, P. Huerre, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365 (1984).
    F. P. Browand, C.‐M. Ho, J. Mécanique (1983) in press.

  17. 17. J. P. Christiansen, N. J. Zabusky, J. Fluid Mech. 61, 219, (1973).https://doi.org/JFLSA7

  18. 18. N. J. Zabusky, M. H. Hughes, K. V. Roberts, J. Comput. Phys. 30, 96 (1979). https://doi.org/JCTPAH
    H.‐M. Wu, E. A. Overman, II, N. J. Zabusky, J. Comput. Phys 53, 42 (1984).https://doi.org/JCTPAH

  19. 19. A. Koestler, The Act of Creation, Hutchison, London, 1964, page 454.

  20. 20. M. L. Norman, L. L. Smarr, K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. D. Smith, Astron. Astrophys. 113, 285 (1982); https://doi.org/AAEJAF
    M. L. Norman, K.‐H. A. Winkler, L. L. Smarr, in Astrophysical Jets, A. Ferrari, A. G. Pacholczyk, eds., Reidel, Boston (1983) 227;
    M. L. Norman, L. L. Smarr, K.‐H. A. Winkler, in Numerical Astrophysics, a Festschrift in Honor of James R. Wilson, J. Centrella, R. Bowers, J. Leblanc, M. Leblanc, eds. Jones and Bartlett, Boston (1984);
    M. L. Norman, K.‐H. A. Winkler, in Astrophysical Radiation Hydrodynamics, K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, eds., Reidel, Boston (1984).

  21. 21. Figure 5 on supersonic jets and the cover figure have not been previously published and were provided by M. L. Norman, K.‐H. A. Winkler, and L. L. Smarr. A review of their work with 30 colored panels is in L. L. Smarr, M. L. Norman, K.‐H. A. Winkler, Physica D (1984), in press. Figure 6 is from work in progress by Norman, Winkler and Zabusky.

  22. 22. For some vital thoughts on how things could be improved, see P. J. Davis, J. A. Anderson, SIAM Rev. 21, 112 (1979).https://doi.org/SIREAD

  23. 23. E. Chargaff, Science 172, 637 (1971).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  24. 24. C. J. Jung, W. Pauli, The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche, Pantheon, New York (1955), page 151.

More about the authors

Norman J. Zabusky, University of Pittsburgh.

Related content
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
/
Article
Detecting quantum particles of gravity was long considered hopeless. A new perspective, which takes advantage of quantum technologies, suggests that an experimental realization may be closer than previously thought.
/
Article
As higher-education programs compete for a shrinking pool of students, departments must better communicate the value that a physics major brings.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1984_07.jpeg

Volume 37, Number 7

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.