Discover
/
Article

Antiproton–proton colliders and Intermediate Bosons

AUG 01, 1980
Phase‐space cooling makes p̄p colliders practical; CERN and Fermilab plan to use them to find and measure the properties of the Intermediate Vector Bosons
David Cline
Carlo Rubbia

The development of particle accelerators in the 1920–30’s was strongly influenced by the availability of intense sources of ions as well as the ability to shape magnetic fields and to produce high electric fields. Later, electron synchrotrons required intense electron sources. Still later the development of electron–positron colliding‐beam machines required positron sources. At present CERN and Fermilab are developing intense sources of antiprotons and related beam‐cooling techniques needed to make intense sources. We expect these antiproton sources to influence the development of future particle accelerators and storage rings just as profoundly as ion, electron and positron sources have in the past. One immediate use for the antiprotons is the creation of high‐energy antiproton–proton colliders.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. G. I. Budker, Atomnaya Energiya 22, 346 (1967).

  2. 2. The feasibility of cooling high‐energy beams using electrons is described in D. Cline, A. Garren, H. Herr, F. E. Mills, C. Rubbia, A. Ruggiero, D. Young, “High Energy Electron Cooling to Improve the Luminosity and Lifetime in Colliding Beam Machines.” SLAC‐PUB‐2278, March 1979.

  3. 3. S. Van Der Meer, “Stochastic Cooling of Betatron Oscillations in the ISR,” CERN‐ISR, PO/72/31 (1972).

  4. 4. G. Carron, L. Thorndahl, “Stochastic Cooling of Momentum Spread by Filter Techniques,” CERN Report 2RF/78‐12 (1979);
    D Möhl, G. Petrucci, L. Thorndahl, S. Van Der Meer, CERN/PS/AA 79‐23 (1979).

  5. 5. G. I. Budker et al., “New Experimental Results of Electron Cooling,” Preprint 76‐32, Nucl. Phys. Inst., Novosibirsk. Presented to the All Union High‐Energy Accelerator Conference, Moscow, October 1976.
    G. I. Budker et al., Particle Accelerators 7, 2044 (1976), https://doi.org/PLACBD
    G. I. Budker et al., ”Experimental Study of Electron Cooling,” IYaF Preprint 76‐33, Nucl. Phys. Inst., Novosibirsk (1976). (Translated by Brookhaven National Laboratory, BNL‐TR‐634).

  6. 6. D. Möhl, “Stochastic Cooling,” CERN Report PS/D7/78‐75 (1978).

  7. 7. M. Bell et al., “Electron Cooling Experiment at CERN,” CERN EP/79‐96, 3 Sept. 1979.

  8. 8. F. Sacherer, “Stochastic Cooling Theory,” CERN Report IST/TH78‐11.

  9. 9. “The Fermilab Electron Cooling Experiment,” Fermilab report, August, 1978.

  10. 10. “The CERN p̄p Design Report,” CERN/PS/AA 78‐3 Report (1978).

  11. 11. C. Rubbia, P. McIntyre, D. Cline, “Producing Massive Neutral Intermediate Vector Bosons with Existing Accelerators,” in Proceedings of the International Neutrino Conference Aachen, H. Faissner, H. Reithler, P. Zerwas (Eds.), 1976.
    D. Cline, P. McIntyre, F. Mills, C. Rubbia, Fermilab Internal Report TM‐689 (1976).

  12. 12. “Tevatron Phase I Report,” Fermilab Report (1979).

  13. 13. D. Cline et al., Harvard/Wisconsin proposal to Fermilab 492 (1976).

  14. 14. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys.‐Math. Soc. Japan 17, 48 (1935).

  15. 15. S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961). https://doi.org/NUPHA7
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    A. Salam, in Elementary Particle Theory: Relativistic Groups and Analyticity (Nobel Symposium No. 8)
    N. Svartholm, ed. (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968) page 367.

  16. 16. F. J. Hasert et al., Phys. Lett. 46B, 121 (1973);
    F. J. Hasert, 46B, 138 (1973);
    F. J. Hasert, Nucl. Phys. B 73, 1 (1974).
    A. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 800 (1974); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 1454 (1974);
    B. Aubert, 32, 1457 (1974).

  17. 17. C. Quigg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 297 (1977);
    L. B. Okun, M. B. Voloshin, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 459 (1977);
    R. F. Peierls, T. L. Trueman, L.‐L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1397 (1977).

  18. 18. F. Paige, “Updated Estimates of W Production in pp and p̄p Interactions,” in Proceedings of the Topical Workshop on New Particles in Super High‐Energy Collisions, Madison, Wise, 1979.

  19. 19. K. O. Mikaelian, M. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 746 (1979).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  20. 20. R. W. Brown, K. O. Mikaelian, Phys. Rev. B 19, 922 (1979).

  21. 21. U. Gastaldi, K. Kilian, G. Plass, “A Low Energy Antiproton Facility at CERN.” CERN/PSCC/79‐17.

More about the authors

David Cline, University of Wisconsin.

Carlo Rubbia, Harvard University.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1980_08.jpeg

Volume 33, Number 8

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.