A rational scale of critical editorial evaluation

JUN 01, 1967

Van Derck Fréchette

Ralph H. Condit

THE value of the criterion of minimum astonishment as a guide to scientific appraisal has been cited by Gilman. While Gilman deplores the quasiqualitative inexactness of the criterion he offers no hope for a quantitative treatment. However, the statement of the generalized principle together with epistemological considerations have led us to quantize the parameter fundamental to its quantitative treatment in the special case of editorial scientific comment.

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Van Derck Fréchette, State University of New York College of Ceramics at Alfred University.

Ralph H. Condit, University of California Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif..

Physics Today is looking for a Senior Editor. Apply Now.

Related content

Features

Article

The last crisis of US physics

At the end of the turbulent 1960s, the postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt. The lessons learned then may be helpful to today’s physicists.

October 02, 2026 02:36 PM

Features

Article

How to build long-lasting professional relationships

Interviews with 22 successful early-career physical scientists and engineers reveal that networking has been one of the most critical ways to nurture their careers.

September 30, 2026 05:46 PM

Features

Article

Navigating academia as a dual-career couple

Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.

September 16, 2026 03:37 PM

Features

Article

The 80-year nuclear legacy in the Marshall Islands

An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.

September 10, 2026 12:45 PM

This Content Appeared In