A rational scale of critical editorial evaluation

JUN 01, 1967

Van Derck Fréchette

Ralph H. Condit

THE value of the criterion of minimum astonishment as a guide to scientific appraisal has been cited by Gilman. While Gilman deplores the quasiqualitative inexactness of the criterion he offers no hope for a quantitative treatment. However, the statement of the generalized principle together with epistemological considerations have led us to quantize the parameter fundamental to its quantitative treatment in the special case of editorial scientific comment.

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Van Derck Fréchette, State University of New York College of Ceramics at Alfred University.

Ralph H. Condit, University of California Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif..

Physics Today is looking for a Senior Editor. Apply Now.

Related content

Features

Article

The Princeton period

May 14, 2026 02:41 PM

Features

Article

Planning reactions to the Oppenheimer security-clearance review

Cognizant of their role within the scientific community, scientific societies had to weigh how to respond to the actions by the Atomic Energy Commission.

May 14, 2026 02:06 PM

Features

Article

Oppenheimer reflects on his early career

Interviews now available to the public bring the famed physicist’s lesser-known early years to life.

May 06, 2026 11:38 AM

Features

Article

Building graduate programs that support mental well-being

Graduate students in physics and astronomy struggle with mental health. Support from peers and advisers is critical; so is institutional change.

April 13, 2026 11:17 AM

This Content Appeared In