Discover
/
Article

A Dialogue on the Theory of High Tc

JUN 01, 1991
The give‐and‐take between two solid‐state theorists offers insight into materials with high superconducting transition temperatures and illustrates the kind of thinking that goes into developing a new theory.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881261

Philip W. Anderson
Robert Schrieffer

Anderson: The consensus is that there is absolutely no consensus on the theory of high‐Tc superconductivity. I suppose that, in a way, this is true. One can find groups working with some level of conviction on almost every hypothesis, and there are groups from very diverse backgrounds (such as quantum chemistry, electronic structure and many‐body physics) working on the problem, groups that have very little meaningful communication with each other. Looked at relative to this scientific Tower of Babel, I suspect you and I are practically speaking the same language. Would you agree?

References

  1. 1. G. M. Eliashberg, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  2. 2. L. D. Landau, Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 920 (1956);
    L. D. Landau, 5, 11 (1957).

  3. 3. See J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, W. A. Benjamin, New York (1964), chapter 7.

  4. 4. See G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics, Plenum, New York (1990), chapter 10.

  5. 5. B. I. Shraiman, E. D. Siggia, Phys. Rev. B 40, 9162 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  6. 6. J. R. Schrieffer, X.‐G. Wen, S.‐C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    A. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6399 (1990); https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    A. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer, 42, 7967 (1990).
    D. M. Frenkel, W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B. 42, 6711 (1990).

  7. 7. See D. J. Scalapino, High Temperature Superconductivity, The Los Alamos Symposium—1989, Addison‐Wesley, Redwood City, Calif. (1990), p. 314.

  8. 8. P. W. Anderson, in Frontiers and Borderlines in Many‐Particle Physics, R. A. Broglia, J. R. Schrieffer, eds., North‐Holland, New York (1987).

  9. 9. A. J. Millis, H. Monien, D. Pines, Phys. Rev. B 42, 167 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  10. 10. C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt‐Rink, E. Abrahams, A. E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  11. 11. N. Nagaosa, P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2450 (1990). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    L. B. Yoffe, P. B. Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 653 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. S. Kivelson, W. P. Su, A. J. Heeger, J. R. Schrieffer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  13. 13. P. W. Anderson, forthcoming book on high‐Tc superconductivity, Princeton U.P., chapters 2, 3 and 6.

  14. 14. P. W. Anderson, in High Temperature Superconductivity, K. Bedell, D. Coffey, D. E. Meltzer, D. Pines, R. Schrieffer, eds., Addison‐Wesley, Redwood City, Calif. (1990), p. 3.

  15. 15. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 42, 2624 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  16. 16. D. S. Dessau, B. O. Wells, Z.‐X. Shen, W. E. Spicer, A. J. Arko, R. S. List, D. B. Mitzi, A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2160 (1991).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  17. 17. K. B. Lyons, J. Kwo, J. F. DillonJr, G. P. Espinosa, M. McGlashan‐Powell, A. P. Ramirez, L. F. Schneemeyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2949 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  18. 18. H. J. Weber, D. Weitbrecht, D. Brach, A. L. Shalankov, H. Keitar, W. Weber, T. Wolf, J. Geerk, G. Linker, G. Roth, P. C. Splittgerber‐Hünnekes, G. Güntherodt, Solid State Comm. 76, 511 (1990).https://doi.org/SSCOA4

  19. 19. S. Spielman, K. Fesler, C. B. Eom, T. H. Geballe, M. M. Fejer, A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 123 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  20. 20. R. F. Kiefl, J. H. Brewer, I. Affleck, J. F. Carolan, P. Dosanjh, W. N. Hardy, T. Hsu, R. Kadono, J. R. Kempton, S. R. Kreitzman, Q. Liu, A. H. O’Reilly, T. M. Riseman, P. Schleger, P. C. E. Stamp, H. Zhou, L. P. Le, G. M. Luke, B. Sternlieb, Y. J. Uemura, H. R. Hart, K. W. Lay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2082 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the Authors

Philip W. Anderson. Princeton University.

Robert Schrieffer. University of California.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1991_06.jpeg

Volume 44, Number 6

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.