Discover
/
Article

A Dialogue on the Theory of High Tc

JUN 01, 1991
The give‐and‐take between two solid‐state theorists offers insight into materials with high superconducting transition temperatures and illustrates the kind of thinking that goes into developing a new theory.
Philip W. Anderson
Robert Schrieffer

Anderson: The consensus is that there is absolutely no consensus on the theory of high‐Tc superconductivity. I suppose that, in a way, this is true. One can find groups working with some level of conviction on almost every hypothesis, and there are groups from very diverse backgrounds (such as quantum chemistry, electronic structure and many‐body physics) working on the problem, groups that have very little meaningful communication with each other. Looked at relative to this scientific Tower of Babel, I suspect you and I are practically speaking the same language. Would you agree?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. G. M. Eliashberg, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960).https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  2. 2. L. D. Landau, Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 920 (1956);
    L. D. Landau, 5, 11 (1957).

  3. 3. See J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, W. A. Benjamin, New York (1964), chapter 7.

  4. 4. See G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics, Plenum, New York (1990), chapter 10.

  5. 5. B. I. Shraiman, E. D. Siggia, Phys. Rev. B 40, 9162 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  6. 6. J. R. Schrieffer, X.‐G. Wen, S.‐C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989). https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    A. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6399 (1990); https://doi.org/PRBMDO
    A. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer, 42, 7967 (1990).
    D. M. Frenkel, W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B. 42, 6711 (1990).

  7. 7. See D. J. Scalapino, High Temperature Superconductivity, The Los Alamos Symposium—1989, Addison‐Wesley, Redwood City, Calif. (1990), p. 314.

  8. 8. P. W. Anderson, in Frontiers and Borderlines in Many‐Particle Physics, R. A. Broglia, J. R. Schrieffer, eds., North‐Holland, New York (1987).

  9. 9. A. J. Millis, H. Monien, D. Pines, Phys. Rev. B 42, 167 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  10. 10. C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt‐Rink, E. Abrahams, A. E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  11. 11. N. Nagaosa, P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2450 (1990). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    L. B. Yoffe, P. B. Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 653 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. S. Kivelson, W. P. Su, A. J. Heeger, J. R. Schrieffer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  13. 13. P. W. Anderson, forthcoming book on high‐Tc superconductivity, Princeton U.P., chapters 2, 3 and 6.

  14. 14. P. W. Anderson, in High Temperature Superconductivity, K. Bedell, D. Coffey, D. E. Meltzer, D. Pines, R. Schrieffer, eds., Addison‐Wesley, Redwood City, Calif. (1990), p. 3.

  15. 15. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 42, 2624 (1990).https://doi.org/PRBMDO

  16. 16. D. S. Dessau, B. O. Wells, Z.‐X. Shen, W. E. Spicer, A. J. Arko, R. S. List, D. B. Mitzi, A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2160 (1991).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  17. 17. K. B. Lyons, J. Kwo, J. F. DillonJr, G. P. Espinosa, M. McGlashan‐Powell, A. P. Ramirez, L. F. Schneemeyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2949 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  18. 18. H. J. Weber, D. Weitbrecht, D. Brach, A. L. Shalankov, H. Keitar, W. Weber, T. Wolf, J. Geerk, G. Linker, G. Roth, P. C. Splittgerber‐Hünnekes, G. Güntherodt, Solid State Comm. 76, 511 (1990).https://doi.org/SSCOA4

  19. 19. S. Spielman, K. Fesler, C. B. Eom, T. H. Geballe, M. M. Fejer, A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 123 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  20. 20. R. F. Kiefl, J. H. Brewer, I. Affleck, J. F. Carolan, P. Dosanjh, W. N. Hardy, T. Hsu, R. Kadono, J. R. Kempton, S. R. Kreitzman, Q. Liu, A. H. O’Reilly, T. M. Riseman, P. Schleger, P. C. E. Stamp, H. Zhou, L. P. Le, G. M. Luke, B. Sternlieb, Y. J. Uemura, H. R. Hart, K. W. Lay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2082 (1990).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the authors

Philip W. Anderson, Princeton University.

Robert Schrieffer, University of California.

Related content
/
Article
A half century after the discovery of Hawking radiation, we are still dealing with the quantum puzzle it exposed.
/
Article
Since the discovery was first reported in 1999, researchers have uncovered many aspects of the chiral-induced spin selectivity effect, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
/
Article
Metrologists are using fundamental physics to define units of measure. Now NIST has developed new quantum sensors to measure and realize the pascal.
/
Article
Nanoscale, topologically protected whirlpools of spins have the potential to move from applications in spintronics into quantum science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1991_06.jpeg

Volume 44, Number 6

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.