A debate on preprint exchange—Rebuttal: Some comments on Pasternak’s criticism

JUN 01, 1966

Rebuttal: Some Comments On Pasternack’s Criticism

Michael Moravcsik

PIE IS PROPOSED AS AN EXPERIMENT in prepublication communication. Just as with a scientific experiment, the outcome can not be entirely known beforehand; otherwise it would not be necessary to carry out the experiment. If we had definite answers to all the questions one can ask about scientific communication patterns and methods, this and other debates would not have to take place at all. We would simply institute programs that embody the answers, and, barring mismanagement, success would be assured.

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Michael Moravcsik, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore.

Physics Today is looking for a Senior Editor. Apply Now.

Related content

Features

Article

When it comes to science engagement, hire a professional

Researchers don’t need to do science engagement alone. Working with professionals makes the job easier and more effective and can lead to better science.

July 14, 2026 03:02 PM

Features

Article

Willful ignorance of the global impact of nuclear war

Even a limited nuclear war could disrupt the climate, ecosystems, and global food supplies. Nuclear strategies and decisions should be required to factor in those potential consequences.

July 13, 2026 10:02 AM

Features

Article

The elusive signatures of quantum gravity

To go beyond classical models and tie our understanding of gravity to the quantum world, experiments are needed.

June 12, 2026 09:58 AM

Features

Article

The pioneering life of Edward Alexander Bouchet

The first African American physicist to earn a PhD made the best of a difficult career path.

June 08, 2026 02:14 PM

This Content Appeared In