/
Article

A debate on preprint exchange

JUN 01, 1966
Michael Moravcsik
Simon Pasternack

How best to communicate scientific research results and ideas is subject to strong differences of opinion among physicists. Particularly at issue is a proposal to systematically reproduce and circulate preliminary research reports and other similar documents.

This article is only available in PDF format

More about the authors

Michael Moravcsik, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore.

Simon Pasternack, The Physical Review, American Physical Society.

Related content
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
/
Article
Detecting quantum particles of gravity was long considered hopeless. A new perspective, which takes advantage of quantum technologies, suggests that an experimental realization may be closer than previously thought.
/
Article
As higher-education programs compete for a shrinking pool of students, departments must better communicate the value that a physics major brings.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1966_06.jpeg

Volume 19, Number 6

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.