A look back at the year online
DOI: 10.1063/PT.4.0486
As I write this retrospective of Physics Today‘s year online, the most viewed item on the BBC’s website is not about the Syrian uprising, the US fiscal cliff, North Korean rockets, or any other momentous topic. Rather, it’s about the villages of Derby Line, Vermont, and Stanstead, Quebec, which abut each other across the US–Canadian border. Not so long ago, residents of Derby Line and Stanstead were free to walk across the border when they liked. Now they face fines for doing so. They are peeved.
Similarly, the most popular item on Physics Today‘s website in 2012 was not our coverage of the discovery of the Higgs boson or the announcement of the year’s Nobel Prize in Physics. The top spot went instead to David Kramer’s short news story, ‘NASA announces a new Mars mission
Science controversies past and present
Besides the capriciousness of what gets picked by social media or online aggregators, online popularity lists also reveal what people care most about. The second most-viewed item in 2012 was a feature article from October 2011. In ‘Science controversies past and present
The possibility that anthropogenic climate change might be empirically vindicated riled some online readers enough to comment extensively on the article and to share it with their skeptical friends, acquaintances, and colleagues. The article continued to attract (mostly hostile) comments for months after it had originally appeared.
Richard Somerville and Susan Hassol’s feature article, ‘Communicating the science of climate change
Teaching general relativity to undergraduates
Physics is notoriously difficult to teach—which partly explains why some physics teachers, eager to share their enthusiasm for the subject, develop and seek new, more effective pedagogical methods. The fourth most-viewed item in 2012 tackled one of the most difficult fields within physics: general relativity.
In ‘Teaching general relativity to undergraduates
Textbook electrodynamics may contradict relativity
In fifth place came Steven Corneliussen’s Science and the Media column
More climate change
‘You should resign, and if you don’t, I’ll work to see that you are fired’ is one example of the threats that climate scientists have received for claiming, on the basis of their experiments, simulations, and theories, that humanity’s emission of greenhouse gases is warming Earth’s troposphere. Physics Today‘s Toni Feder reported
Her story was the sixth most-viewed item in 2012. Like the magazine’s other coverage of climate change, it attracted vitriolic comments, including this one, which, while seeking to downplay the story, inadvertently exemplified the hostility that climate scientists face:
Oh, puleeeeze... There must be great comfort in pretending to be victims, in some deep, dark recess of the 21st Century mind. The real scientists of the past would vomit at these mewlings.
Women in physics: A tale of limits
Rachel Ivie and Casey Tesfaye noted at the beginning of their seventh-placed article, ‘Women in physics: A tale of limits
Rachel and Casey’s article was based on a survey they conducted of women physicists around the world. Despite covering countries of different levels of development, the survey’s message was remarkably consistent: Cultural expectations about housework and children inhibit women’s careers in physics.
Predicting and managing extreme weather events
Yes, another article about climate appears in the 2012 top-10. In eighth place came an article by Jane Lubchenko and Thomas Karl entitled ‘Predicting and managing extreme weather events.
Nanotechnology in cancer medicine
The penultimate item in the 2012 top 10 is Jennifer Grossman and Scott McNeil’s feature article, ‘Nanotechnology in cancer medicine
Networks in motion
All of the top nine items of 2012 were freely available to anyone with an internet browser. Not so the tenth most-viewed item of 2012, ‘Networks in motion
A final note: In compiling this list, I was careful to use the term ‘item,’ rather than webpage. By far the two most popular webpages in 2012 were those of the Physics Update