The gap between physics bachelor’s recipients and grad school spots is growing
Freddie Pagani for Physics Today
The number of bachelor’s degrees in physics awarded annually at US institutions is at or near an all-time high—nearly double what it was two decades ago. Yet the number of first-year physics graduate students has grown much more slowly, at only around 1–2% per year. The difference in the growth rates of bachelor’s recipients and graduate spots may be increasing the competition that students face when interested in pursuing graduate study.
With potentially more students applying for a relatively fixed number of first-year graduate openings, students may need to apply to more schools, which would take more time and cost more money. As the graduate school admissions process becomes more competitive, applicants may need even more accomplishments and experiences, such as postbaccalaureate research, to gain acceptance. Such opportunities are not available equally to all students. To read about steps one department has taken to make admissions more equitable, see the July Physics Today article
We do not view the increasing gap between bachelor’s recipients and graduate spots as necessarily a problem, nor do we believe that all physics majors should be expected to go to graduate school. Rather, we assert that this trend is one that both prospective applicants and those advising them should be aware of so students can make an informed decision about their postgraduation plans.
Gathering the data
For our analysis, we used data from the annual rosters of physics enrollments
The number of bachelor’s degrees awarded in the US has grown significantly over the past two decades. The numbers of first-year graduate students and graduate degree recipients have grown more slowly. Source: AIP’s annual rosters of physics enrollments
To determine the overall competitiveness of physics graduate school, we assumed that the number of bachelor’s degrees awarded represents the potential applicant pool and that the number of first-year graduate students in the following fall term represents the number of graduate school spots available to those degree recipients.
Although a recent AIP survey
The overall picture
Comparing the three-year national averages of the number of first-year graduate students and the number of bachelor’s degrees awarded, we find that the potential competition for spots in physics graduate programs has nearly doubled over the past two decades. In 2003 there were 0.67 graduate school spots per undergraduate physics degree (3008 first-year graduate students compared with 4504 bachelor’s degrees awarded). In 2020 there were 0.36 spots (3337 first-year graduate students compared with 9182 bachelor’s degrees awarded).
And opportunities may be even narrower for students from the US. The most recent year of data indicates that around 10% of bachelor’s physics degrees in the US are awarded to international students, whereas around 42% of physics graduate students are international.
The ratio of physics graduate school spots to physics bachelor’s degrees awarded has substantially decreased over the past two decades, both overall and for domestic students.
To understand what the trend looks like for US students, we scaled the overall trend by the average percentage of US students in physics graduate school over the past two decades (55%) divided by the average percentage of physics bachelor’s degrees earned by US students over that time frame (93.7%). We did this not because graduate schools split their spots into domestic and international ones but rather to acknowledge that a significant fraction of first-year graduate students are not represented in our applicant pool.
Doing so, we find that the number of spots in physics graduate school per US physics bachelor’s degree awarded has dropped from 0.39 in 2003 to 0.21 today. In other words, for every five US undergraduate physics students, there is one graduate school spot available.
Institutional nuances
Looking only at the national picture can obscure the various routes to a graduate physics degree. Accordingly, we also examined how the number of graduate spots per bachelor’s degree has changed over time based on the institution. Even when we broke up the data according to the highest physics degree offered and whether the institution is public or private, the same basic trend of fewer spots per bachelor’s degree holds.
The ratio of spots in graduate programs to the number of bachelor’s degrees produced, broken out by the highest physics degree offered and the type of institution.
The institutional data do provide insights into how the gap between bachelor’s degree recipients and first-year graduate spots has widened. In the early 2000s, the annual number of students accepted into graduate physics programs at PhD-granting institutions exceeded the number of physics bachelor’s degrees conferred by those schools. Today those institutions accept only a fraction of graduate students per bachelor’s degree that they award. The trend is especially apparent for PhD-granting departments at public institutions, where the number of graduate spots per bachelor’s degree has been cut in half. That’s likely because most of the growth in physics bachelor’s degree recipients has happened at those institutions.
Examining the trend for women
Besides the number of graduate school spots, to whom those spots are going is important too. AIP’s Statistical Research Center provided us with gender data for first-year graduate students, which allowed us to examine the representation of women in the incoming classes of PhD-granting institutions over the past two decades. (Data on race and ethnicity were not available.)
The percentage of women among physics bachelor’s recipients, first-year graduate students, and domestic first-year graduate students. The percentage of women among first-year graduate students tends to follow the same pattern as the percentage of women earning physics bachelor’s degrees. Bachelor’s degree data extracted from AIP’s Percent of Physics Bachelor’s Earned by Women, Classes of 1976 to 2020
Looking at the three-year averages, we find that the percentage of physics graduate school spots awarded to women has largely followed the trend of physics bachelor’s degrees awarded to women. Until recently, the fraction of women among first-year graduate students hovered around 20%. More recently, however, both the fraction of bachelor’s degrees awarded to women and the fraction of first-year graduate students who are women have been increasing.
Taken together, the results suggest that although women are still underrepresented in physics, the increasingly competitive nature of physics graduate admissions has not resulted in further underrepresentation.
Outlook and implications
The number of graduate students is inherently tied to the amount of departmental funding. With budgets unlikely in the near future to expand enough to allow a dramatic increase in the number of graduate school spots, it is unlikely that these trends will change in the near future on the graduate student side. On the potential applicant side, however, the number of physics bachelor’s degree recipients declined for the first time in nearly two decades for the class of 2021, and the number of junior and senior physics majors is also decreasing, so fewer applicants may vie for those spots in coming years.
The fact that not every person who receives a bachelor’s in physics in the US can attend a US graduate school isn’t necessarily a problem, but it should give physics faculty pause. Leaders of undergraduate physics programs should be aware that many of their graduates will not attend graduate school. Departments should develop curriculums that prepare students for alternative paths and provide regular, updated information
Students considering graduate school should be strategic in their choice of applications, balancing the likelihood of acceptance and the time and financial resources needed to apply. Students should also be aware that they may need to apply to graduate school during multiple academic years and consider alternative opportunities in the meantime.
For their part, graduate degree–granting departments need to consider how they allocate the limited number of spots in their programs and whether that process aligns with their equity goals. In particular, departments should take steps to prevent an arms race, in which applicants need better and better CVs to get a spot.
An arms race may at first glance appear to benefit departments. As a result, they may admit students who have extensive research experience, peer-reviewed publications, or a master’s degree. But applicants from marginalized groups or who have had nontraditional paths may not have had the same opportunities as their peers. To work toward their diversity, equity, and inclusion goals, departments should evaluate students’ accomplishments in the context of the opportunities available to them, highlighting their potential for graduate success.