DoD cuts missile defense funding
DOI: 10.1063/PT.4.1205
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced a radical overhaul of the DoD budget, which was increased by 4% but saw a $1.4 billion cut to the Missile Defense Agency
Gates proposed canceling the second airborne laser (ABL) prototype aircraft
The proposed missile defense cuts arrived the day before President Obama gave a speech in Prague that touched on the long-term strategic implications on the current missile defense system, which includes basing radar and missile systems in Europe amid protests from the Russians and most of the local populations.
“The Czech Republic and Poland have been courageous in agreeing to host a defense against these missiles. As long as the threat from Iran persists, we will go forward with a missile defense system that is cost-effective and proven,” said Obama. “If the Iranian threat is eliminated, we will have a stronger basis for security, and the driving force for missile defense construction in Europe will be removed.”
The speech highlights pressure on Russia to engage with the US in dealing with Iran’s nuclear and missile program. The subtext is that if the Iranian security issues can be addressed, then the rationale for the European-based missile defense system disappears.
Although medium- and long-range missile defense programs got cut, short-range and naval-based missile defense systems got a funding boost. Gates added "$200 million to fund conversion of six additional Aegis ships to provide ballistic missile defense capabilities
Bad news for contractors
Other weapon overhauls include the F-22 fighter
Gates’s goal is to try to move the US military, and in turn the military-industrial complex, away from futuristic weapons systems to equipment that troops can use in conflicts they are currently engaged in: warfare in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan. That is why unmanned drones such as the Predator and Reaper get a big budget increase. The difficulty for Gates is that many of these programs are split up into different congressional districts to maximize support for these programs in Congress.
“In the coming weeks, we will hear a great deal about threats and risks and danger to our country and to our men and women in uniform, associated with different budget choices,” Gates said. But, he added: “It is one thing to speak generally about the need for budget discipline and acquisition and contract reform. It is quite another to make tough choices about specific systems and defense priorities based solely on the national interest and then stick to those decisions over time.”
One area of Gates’ speech that was overlooked included hints that the strategic nuclear weapons programs could be overhauled in light of the " Quadrennial Defense Review
Other policy news from FYI this week
NSF gets support from representatives
Seventy-three representatives have signed a letter to House Appropriations Subcommittee chairman Alan Mollohan (D-WV) and ranking member Frank Wolf (R-VA) in support of President Obama’s $7 billion budget for the National Science Foundation in FY 2010.
APS executive officer testifies before appropriators
Judy Franz, the executive officer of the American Physical Society, testified before the House Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations Subcommittee on April 2. The subcommittee, which has jurisdiction over National Science Foundation funding, convened to receive public testimony. Franz was raising concerns over the boom- bust cycle in science funding and supporting a temporary $150 to $200 million start-up fund for new, young, nontenured science faculty members.
House hearings provide insight on appropriators’ thinking
FYI: The AIP Bulletin of Science Policy News takes a look at the members of the House appropriations subcommittees that deal with science funding.