Data from NASA’s InSight sharpen our look at Mars’s core
NASA/JPL-Caltech
In late 2018 NASA’s InSight—a lander possessing the agency’s only seismometer on Mars—began listening for vibrational signals. The seismometer shown in the photo picked up about 1300 distinct seismic events during its four years on the job. The majority were small, and none exceeded a moment magnitude of 5. But many were still large enough for researchers to work out the planetary structure.
Sound waves travel through the planet at different speeds, reflecting and refracting from the boundaries of its various layers. And those speeds vary with the layers’ stiffness, density, and temperature. By resolving the difference in the waves’ arrival times at a seismometer and their polarizations, the researchers could resolve where each seismic event took place—even using a single seismometer. Equipped with those locations and the details of when and where the sounds bounce around inside the planet, the scientists resolved the depth of the shallow crust and the boundaries where the mantle emerged from it. They even detected the fainter waves that reflect from the deeper core–mantle boundary. (See Physics Today, October 2021, page 17
The mission formally ended in December. But as Jessica Irving
Models that were based on those physical properties revealed a core slightly denser and a few tens of kilometers smaller than had been estimated just two years earlier. (Irving, Lekić, and their colleagues calculate a new, more accurate radius as 1780–1810 km.) Those results are consistent with a completely liquid iron-alloy core. And because the researchers’ measurements provided constraints on the velocities of seismic waves traversing the core, they were able to develop the first seismically based estimate of the core’s composition. It’s rich in sulfur, with smaller fractions of oxygen, carbon, and hydrogen. Both features distinguish Mars from Earth, whose interior is composed of a solid inner core and a liquid outer core. Mars’s core is therefore much more compressible than Earth’s. And that key difference may be one reason that the two planets have formed and evolved so differently. (J. C. E. Irving et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2217090120, 2023