Discover
/
Article

Another close look at big G

AUG 19, 2013
Newton’s gravitational constant has been around for centuries and remains one of the most poorly known fundamental quantities of physics.
18438/pt42537_pt-4-2537-online-f1.jpg

In 1798, more than 70 years after Isaac Newton died, Henry Cavendish was the first to measure Newton’s gravitational constant G. He used a torsion balance in which test masses on a suspended balance beam were slightly deflected by nearby source masses. In 2001 physicists at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres, France, used an updated torsion balance to measure G in two substantially independent ways—the standard Cavendish method that relies on measuring the angular deflections and an electrostatic force compensation method that holds the test masses steady against deflections. The two results agreed within their uncertainties but were notably higher than the previously best-determined value. The BIPM team has now rebuilt its torsion balance (seen in the figure) to reduce uncertainties and has redone the measurements. The two methods again generated values that agree with each other; the new combined result is G = 6.67545(18) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 with an uncertainty of 27 parts per million. The value statistically agrees with the team’s earlier result but is 241 ppm above the 2010 value recommended by the international Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA). Two of the researchers are organizing a 2014 conference that will feature all experimenters with recent big G results, trying to pin down this poorly known fundamental quantity. (T. Quinn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., in press .)—Stephen G. Benka

Related content
/
Article
The finding that the Saturnian moon may host layers of icy slush instead of a global ocean could change how planetary scientists think about other icy moons as well.
/
Article
/
Article
After a foray into international health and social welfare, she returned to the physical sciences. She is currently at the Moore Foundation.
/
Article
Modeling the shapes of tree branches, neurons, and blood vessels is a thorny problem, but researchers have just discovered that much of the math has already been done.

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.