Analysis of arXiv submissions reveals international plagiarism patterns

Science : The final step before papers are approved for publication on the arXiv eprint server is an automated comparison of their text with the other papers in the system. Paul Ginsparg of Cornell University and founder of arXiv, along with one of his students, Daniel Citron, ran an analysis of the 757 000 papers in the system to determine how often “text reuse” occurs. They filtered out legitimate quotes and review articles and found that 1 in 16 authors quoted their own previous papers at length. They also found that 1 in 1000 authors copied a paragraph’s worth of text from other authors without citing those papers. Geographical data reveal that plagiarism is significantly more common in some countries than in others. In total, just 6% of submitting authors were flagged for plagiarism. However, in Bulgaria, 20% of submitting authors were flagged; in Iran, 15%; in the US, 5%; and in both Germany and New Zealand, fewer than 5%. Ginsparg and Citron believe the discrepancy is due to differences in academic cultures.