Discover
/
Article

A stellar source of lithium is caught in the act

MAY 01, 2015
To explain the observed abundance of the light metallic element, astrophysical modelers have concluded that much of it was produced in stars. But direct evidence has been lacking until now.

DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.2766

Of all the elements of the periodic table, lithium has perhaps the most complicated and mysterious origins, in part because it can be created in so many ways. Its dominant isotope, 7Li, is one of the few species (along with deuterium, helium-3, and helium-4) to have been produced in Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Cosmic-ray spallation—nuclear fission initiated when energetic protons and other particles collide with interstellar carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen—is a significant source of Li, beryllium, and boron. And Li can be both produced and destroyed in stars, although questions remain about the nature of the stellar sources and how much Li they produce. In the effort to derive a clear picture of the chemical evolution of our galaxy by combining observations of elemental abundances with their known mechanisms of creation and destruction, the so-called “lithium problem” has been an especially tough one to crack.

Now Akito Tajitsu, of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, and his colleagues have found direct evidence of Li production in a stellar system—specifically, a classical nova: a thermonuclear explosion on a white dwarf that blows away the dwarf’s outer layers. 1 The researchers used NAOJ’s Subaru Telescope, located on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, to monitor the absorption spectrum of the cast-off layers. They found a set of absorption lines that pointed to the presence of 7Be, a radioisotope and progenitor of 7Li. The short-lived 7Be must have been produced in the nova explosion.

“This is actually the first time that the formation of lithium has been caught ‘in the act,’” says Francesca D’Antona of the Rome Observatory. If the observation can be repeated for other novae, it will help to determine how much of today’s Li could have been produced in such explosions—a question that modelers of Li evolution would dearly like to see answered.

The lithium problem

The best data on Li abundances come from meteorites, which record the composition of our solar system just before the Sun started burning. Observations of stars of various ages provide information about other eras. Together, they suggest that Li abundance has been on the rise for most of our galaxy’s history; the source of the increase lacks a clear explanation. 2 And of the solar system’s Li, at most 30% is accounted for by Big Bang nucleosynthesis and cosmic-ray spallation together. Core-collapse supernovae can explain at most another 20%, which leaves at least 50% for all other stellar sources. 3

The mechanism by which Li is synthesized in stars, shown in red in figure 1, seems almost contradictory. First, 3He and 4He combine to make 7Be, which decays with a half-life of about 50 days into 7Li. The He fusion step requires high temperatures—but if the nascent 7Be and 7Li remain at those temperatures, they’re quickly destroyed via the reactions shown in blue.

PTO.v68.i5.16_1.f1.jpg

Figure 1. Lithium in stars is produced by the mechanism shown in red. The first step requires high temperature. But if the beryllium-7 and lithium-7 remain at high temperature, they’re destroyed via the reactions shown in blue.

View larger

A stellar Li factory therefore needs a way to create 7Be and quickly cool it. Novae could easily qualify: The explosion itself is hot, and the cast-off layers are speedily ejected into interstellar space. A few classes of giant stars have also been identified as possible candidates. But models of each of them show that they collectively fall well short of producing enough Li to explain the solar system’s present abundance. 3

Blueshifted beryllium

Tajitsu and company have been using the Subaru Telescope and its High Dispersion Spectrograph (HDS) to study novae for several years. In mid-August 2013, when a nova appeared that was especially bright across a broad continuum of optical wavelengths, they hoped they could glean new information about the material expelled in the explosion. Light from the still-exploding star passes through the cast-off layers and thus captures their absorption spectra. Because the absorbing material is moving rapidly away from the star toward us, the spectrum is strongly blueshifted.

The researchers thought they might see absorption lines that they could attribute to Li itself, but they didn’t— perhaps because all the Li produced in the nova was ionized. Instead, they saw a group of curious near-UV features, labeled A, B, C, and D in figure 2. The features were identifiable for only a few days, between six and seven weeks after the explosion reached its peak: Before that, they were too saturated for their exact wavelengths to be determined, and after that, they had faded away to nothing.

PTO.v68.i5.16_1.f2.jpg

Figure 2. The spectrum of a 2013 nova contains four unusual absorption features in the near UV, labeled A, B, C, and D in the top panel. Nearby spectral lines of hydrogen and calcium show that the spectrum consists of two separate blueshifted components. Accounting for the blueshifts allows the four new features to be confidently assigned to two resonances of 7Be+. The green lines in the bottom panel show where the equivalent resonances of 9Be+ would fall. (Adapted from ref. 1.)

View larger

Nearby known spectral lines, from hydrogen and calcium, showed that the spectrum actually had two distinct velocity components, one at 1103 km/s and one at 1268 km/s. Undoing that double blueshift revealed that the four unusual lines exactly matched a pair of resonances in Be+. Thanks to the HDS’s high resolution, the researchers could conclusively assign the absorption features to radioactive 7Be+ rather than stable 9Be+, even though their resonance wavelengths differ by less than 0.02 nm.

Comparing the Be+ lines to the analogous Ca+ lines allowed Tajitsu and colleagues to form a rough estimate of how much Be was expelled—and thus how much Li was created—in the explosion: perhaps 3 to 10 times as much as models predict. But that’s just for one nova, whose Li production might be unusually high or low. Many more observations will be needed to determine the average Li yield.

Though our galaxy hosts about 40 novae per year, only about 10 of them are observed, and just a fraction of those are bright enough for observers to have a chance of seeing the Be+ lines. But at least now the researchers know what to look for, and they know they have the right instruments. “The beryllium-7 lines are located in the near-UV range,” says Tajitsu. “To see them, we need a good location at high altitude, a large-aperture telescope, and a UV-sensitive spectrograph. The combination of the Subaru Telescope and the HDS is perfectly suitable.”

References

  1. 1. A. Tajitsu et al., Nature 518, 381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14161

  2. 2. F. D’Antona, P. Ventura, in Proceedings IAU Symposium 268: Light Elements in the Universe, C. Charbonnel, M. Tosi, F. Primas, C. Chiappini, eds., Cambridge U. Press (2010), p. 395.

  3. 3. N. Prantzos, Astron. Astrophys. 542, A67 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219043

This Content Appeared In
pt_cover0515.jpg

Volume 68, Number 5

Related content
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
/
Article
Despite the tumultuous history of the near-Earth object’s parent body, water may have been preserved in the asteroid for about a billion years.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.