Because of their importance as indicators of possible climate change, estimates of annual global temperatures have attracted intense scrutiny. For more than 30 years, such estimates have come from three independent groups: the University of East Anglia in England together with the UK Met Office Hadley Center; NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Sciences; and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center. The data from all three manifest a slow rise in the mean annual global temperature over the past century. Some critics have raised doubts about possible sources of bias that might be influencing the observed trend. In response, the three groups have performed numerous corrections and checks on their calculations. For those still not convinced that the observed upward trend is real, there’s now confirmation from a fourth group, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project and its collaborators. Their approach differed from previous ones by including data from many more weather stations and by using a statistical fit to adjust for discontinuities in the data that are unrelated to the climate. The global temperatures, calculated so far just for land surface temperatures, agree with previous results. (R. Rohde et al., Geoinfor. Geostat: An Overview1, 1 2013.)—Barbara G. Levi
The finding that the Saturnian moon may host layers of icy slush instead of a global ocean could change how planetary scientists think about other icy moons as well.
Modeling the shapes of tree branches, neurons, and blood vessels is a thorny problem, but researchers have just discovered that much of the math has already been done.
January 29, 2026 12:52 PM
Get PT in your inbox
PT The Week in Physics
A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.
One email per week
PT New Issue Alert
Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.
One email per month
PT Webinars & White Papers
The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.