Discover
/
Article

Wiggler and undulator magnets

MAY 01, 1981
Two new devices are being added to synchrotron radiation sources to extend the spectral range and increase brightness.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2914568

Herman Winick
George Brown
Klaus Halbach
John Harris

To scientists using vacuum ultraviolet and x rays the most important characteristics of an ideal radiation source would be a high intensity within a small solid angle and a high intensity within a small wavelength interval, both extending over a broad range of wavelengths. High spatial brightness (large flux within a small solid angle) permits the delivery of a large number of photons per second to a small sample. High spectral brightness (large flux within a narrow wavelength interval) is essential for high‐resolution spectroscopy. A high‐power tunable vuv and x‐ray laser would be ideal, but unfortunately such a laser does not yet exist. Conventional vuv sources (such as gas‐discharge lamps) and x‐ray sources (such as electron‐impact x‐ray tubes) can produce a large flux of radiation, most of which is indeed within a narrow bandwidth at particular fluorescent lines. However, the flux is diffused over a large solid angle and the wavelength is fixed. The continuum radiation from these sources is less intense than the narrow fluorescence peaks by about four orders of magnitude. Other sources exist, such as laser plasma sources and sliding‐spark devices, that provide more intense continuum radiation but have other limitations, such as low repetition rate, limited spectral range and attendant debris.

References

  1. 1. H. Winick, T. Knight, eds., Wiggler Magnets, SSRL Report 77/05 (From SSRL, SLAC Bin 69, Stanford, Cal. 94305).

  2. 2. A. Luccio, A. Reales, S. Stipcich, eds., Proc. Wiggler Conf. June 1978. From Laboratori Nazionale de Frascati casella Postale 13, I‐00044 Frascati (Roma).

  3. 3. D. Thompson, R. Coisson, J. Le Duff, F. Dupont, M. Erickson, A. Hofmann, D. Husmann, G. Mülhaupt, M. Poole, M. Renard, M. Sommer, V. Suller, S. Tazzari, F. Wang, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐28, (to be published in June 1981).

  4. 4. V. L. Ginzberg, Izv.mAkad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Fiz., 11, 165 (1947).

  5. 5. H. Motz, W. Thon, R. N. Whitehurst, J. Appl. Phys. 24, 826 (1953).

  6. 6. D. F. Alferov, Yu. A. Bashmakov, K. A. Belovintsev, E. G. Bessonov, P. A. Cerenkov, Particle Accelerators 9, 223 (1979).

  7. 7. A. N. Didenko, A. V. Kozhevnikov, A. F. Medvedev, M. M. Nikitin, V. Ya. Epp, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 76, 1919 (1979); https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    or A. N. Didenko, A. V. Kozhevnikov, A. F. Medvedev, M. M. Nikitin, V. Ya. Epp, Sov. Phys. JETP 49, 973 (1979).

  8. 8. B. M. Kincaid, Appl. Phys. 38, 2684 (1977).

  9. 9. A. Hofmann, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 152, 17 (1978).

  10. 10. R. Coisson, Phys. Rev. A 20, 5248 (1979).

  11. 11. D. J. Thompson, M. W. Poole, eds., European Synchrotron Radiation Facility‐Supplement II; pages 52, also page 17; European Science Foundation, Strasbourg, (1979).

  12. 12. J. Spencer, H. Winick in Synchrotron Radiation Research, H. Winick, S. Doniach, eds., Plenum, New York 1980, page 663.

  13. 13. S. Krinsky, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 172, 73 (1980).

  14. 14. Y. Farge, App. Opt. 19, 4021 (1980).

  15. 15. K. Halbach, J. Chin, E. Hoyer, H. Winick, R. Cronin, J. Yang, Y. Zambre, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐28, (to be published in June 1981);
    see also K. Halbach, Nucl. Instr. Meth. (to be published).

  16. 16. A. Hofman, R. Little, J. M. Paterson, K. W. Robinson, G. A. Voss, H. Winick, Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on High Energy Accel. CEAL‐2000 Sept. 1967, page 123.

  17. 17. J. R. Rees, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐24, 1836 (1977).

  18. 18. M. Berndt, W. Brunk, R. Cronin, D. Jenson, A. King, J. Spencer, T. Taylor, H. Winick, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐26, 3812 (1979);
    also H. Winick, J. Spencer, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 172, 45 (1980).

  19. 19. L. M. Barkov, V. B. Baryshev, G. N. Kulipanov, N. A. Mezentsev, V. G. Pindyurin, A. N. Skrinsky, V. M. Khorev, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 152, 23 (1978).

  20. 20. H. Winick, R. Helm, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 152, 9 (1978).

  21. 21. V. Suller, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 172, 39 (1980).

  22. 22. H. Kitamura, Jap. Jour. Appl. Phys. 19, L185 (1980).

  23. 23. A. Hofmann, Physics Reports 64, 253 (1980).

More about the Authors

Herman Winick. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.

George Brown. Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.

Klaus Halbach. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

John Harris. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1981_05.jpeg

Volume 34, Number 5

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.