Discover
/
Article

Three decades of fast‐neutron experiments

AUG 01, 1969
Measurements of neutron cross sections and spectra have improved from the early days of homebuilt equipment through the war time developments in the Manhattan District to the present use of commercial accelerators and electronics.
Henry H. Barschall

EXPERIMENTS WITH NEUTRONS in the MeV region are important both for learning about properties of nuclei and for applications in nuclear technology; yet relatively few nuclear physicists work in this area. The reason may be that experiments with neutrons are more difficult than those with charged particles, because neutrons can neither be accelerated nor detected directly. Consequently the accuracy of fast‐neutron experiments is typically an order of magnitude poorer than that of charged‐particle experiments. This comparison partially reflects the enormous advances of recent years in charged‐particle experiments, particularly with solid‐state detectors.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. H. A. Bethe, R. F. Bacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 8, 83 (1936); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    H. A. Bethe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 71 (1937); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    M. S. Livingston, H. A. Bethe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 246 (1937).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  2. 2. H. H. Barschall, M. H. Kanner, Phys. Rev. 58, 590 (1940).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. J. A. Wheeler, H. H. Barschall, Phys. Rev. 58, 682 (1940).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. H. H. Barschall, R. Ladenburg, C. C. Van Voorhis, Phys. Rev. 59, 917 (1941).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. H. H. Barschall, R. Ladenburg, Phys. Rev. 61, 129 (1942).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. H. I. Zagor, F. A. Valente, Phys. Rev. 69, 55 (1946).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  7. 7. H. H. Barschall, M. E. Battat, Phys. Rev. 70, 245 (1946).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  8. 8. H. H. Goldsmith, H. W. Ibser, B. T. Feld, Rev. Mod. Phys. 19, 268 (1947).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  9. 9. C. K. Bockelman, D. W. Miller, R. K. Adair, H. H. Barschall, Phys. Rev. 84, 69 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. C. H. Johnson, F. X. Haas, J. L. Fowler, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13, 601 (1968).https://doi.org/BAPSA6

  11. 11. T. W. Bonner, W. M. Brubaker, Phys. Rev. 50, 308 (1936).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  12. 12. D. W. Glasgow, D. G. Foster, Nucl. Phys. 99, 170 (1967).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  13. 13. P. Huber, E. Baumgartner, Helv. Phys. Acta 26, 420 (1953).https://doi.org/HPACAK

  14. 14. R. K. Adair, S. E. Darden, R. E. Fields, Phys. Rev. 96, 503 (1954).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  15. 15. Compilation of EANDC requests for neutron data measurements, EANDC Report 78 (1968).

More about the authors

Henry H. Barschall, University of Wisconsin at Maidson.

Related content
/
Article
A crude device for quantification shows how diverse aspects of distantly related organisms reflect the interplay of the same underlying physical factors.
/
Article
Events held around the world have recognized the past, present, and future of quantum science and technology.
/
Article
Beneath the ice shelves of the frozen continent, a hidden boundary layer of turbulent ocean is determining Antarctica’s fate.
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_08.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 8

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.