Discover
/
Article

Reviews of Modern Physics at 90

FEB 01, 2019

DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.4132

Randall D. Kamien

In 1597 the English philosopher Francis Bacon wrote, “ipsa scientia potestas est (knowledge itself is power).” Today we are inundated with knowledge and information. There exist nearly a billion websites, more than a million articles on the arXiv eprint server, and now, more than 100 physics journals. What makes one site stand out over another? Is it one particular posted article? Is it one particular journal? The quality of its content? Its breadth of use and appeal?

PTO.v72.i2.32_1.f1.jpg

PEINTURE/NATURE MORTE, 1928 (OIL AND PENCIL ON CANVAS), PATRICK HENRY BRUCE (1881–1936)/PRIVATE COLLECTION/BRIDGEMAN IMAGES

View larger

Over its 90-year history, Reviews of Modern Physics (RMP) has served the whole physics community. The journal has reported on current trends through colloquia and reprinted prize lectures (Nobel and now the American Physical Society’s Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research). It has published values of fundamental constants and particle data, reviewed mature topics, and, perhaps uniquely among the journals of the American Physical Society (APS), it, has offered refereed, pedagogical lectures.

What drives RMP? In a word, impact. It’s not a metric that can easily be used by tenure committees or review panels. Rather, the impact that RMP strives to make is to unify ideas across physics, to introduce readers to new paradigms, and to publish foundational, essential articles that are read over and over again. If a colleague years ago had to stand over a photocopier to obtain a personal version of an RMP paper, it is likely they still have it. If that colleague is like me and my graduate school classmates, the much-loved copy is well worn, extensively annotated, and dotted with coffee and food stains.

For this special issue of Physics Today, RMP’s current editors, former editors, authors, and others have taken a look back at how their respective fields have appeared in the journal. In addition, some of the topics will be further highlighted at the March and April 2019 meetings of APS during RMP-sponsored sessions. If you’re attending either meeting, please join us!

What will the next 90 years bring? I would be foolish to predict, but I know something about the next 10: RMP will continue to follow the expansion of physics and the physics community. We now have an associate editor to encourage and solicit reviews on climate science, we have introduced biophysics and soft matter as independent efforts, and, notably, we are the only one of the APS and American Institute of Physics families of journals that has a devoted editor for astronomy and astrophysics. When our 100th anniversary comes along, take a look!

Reviews of Modern Physics retrospective

1. The history of Reviews of Modern Physics , by Anthony F. Starace

2. The origin of the elements , by Stan Woosley, Virginia Trimble, and Friedrich-Karl Thielemann

3. From simple liquids to colloids and soft matter , by Robert Evans, Daan Frenkel, and Marjolein Dijkstra

4. Beams and plasmas , by Wim Leemans

5. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena , by Bertrand I. Halperin

6. Progress in superconductivity , by Arthur Hebard and Gregory Stewart

7. Tying it all together , by Paul M. Goldbart and Randall D. Kamien

8. Coherent light brighten the quantum science frontier , by Margaret M. Murnane and Jun Ye

9. Quantum foundations , by David P. DiVincenzo and Christopher A. Fuchs

10. Constructing the theory of the standard model , by Mary K. Gaillard and Paul Langacker

11. Experimental basis of the standard model , by Paul Grannis and Vera Lüth

More about the Authors

Randy Kamien is the lead editor of Reviews of Modern Physics and the Vicki and William Abrams Professor in the Natural Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

This Content Appeared In
pt_cover0219_no_label.jpg

Volume 72, Number 2

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.