/
Article

Research with x rays

MAY 01, 1981
No longer limited by weak x‐ray sources, researchers are using intense beams of synchrotron radiation, continuously selectable in energy, to explore the geometric and electronic structure of matter.
Cullie J. Sparks

The brightness of x rays from synchrotron radiation sources has started a renaissance in a field thought to have been left barren by scientists of the first half of this century. By precisely tuning synchrotron radiation to specific electron energy levels researchers are gaining detailed knowledge of the spatial arrangement and electronic structure of atoms in solids. This knowledge promises not only to lead to advances in condensed‐matter theory but to aid in the development of materials with physical and chemical properties tailored to meet specific needs. Experimenters are using the x rays of synchrotron radiation to see biological material at great magnification even in the presence of water, to study the atomic structure of catalytic surfaces while the catalyst is in action, to observe the transient behavior of crystal growth or plastic deformation at millisecond intervals, and to determine atomic arrangements and bonding distances from less than a onolayer of material, just to mention a few examples. A byproduct of the unwieldy devices of medium‐ and high‐energy physics, synchrotron radiation is rapidly becoming one of the most useful contributors to the atomic and molecular sciences.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. D. E. Sayers, E. A. Stern, F. W. Lytle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1204 (1971).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  2. 2. B. M. Kincaid, P. Eisenberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1361 (1975).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  3. 3. F. W. Lytle, G. H. Via, J. H. Sinfelt, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 3831 (1977).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  4. 4. P. H. Citrin, P. Eisenberger, R. C. Hewitt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 309 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  5. 5. J. V. Cathcart, G. F. Petersen, C. J. Sparks, Jr., J. Electrochem. Soc. 116, 664 (1969) and references therein.

  6. 6. P. Eisenberger, W. C. Marra, Phys. Rev. Lett., to be published.

  7. 7. H.‐G. Haubold, D. Martinsen, J. Nucl. Mat. 69–70, 644 (1978).

  8. 8. B. W. Batterman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 703 (1969).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  9. 9. P. L. Cowan, J. A. Golovchenko, M. F. Robbins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1680 (1980).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  10. 10. T. Fukamachi, S. Hosoya, T. Kawamura, J. Hastings, J. Appl. Cryst. 10, 321 (1977).

  11. 11. J. Barrington Leigh, G. Rosenbaum, J. Appl. Cryst. 7, 117 (1974).
    A review has been given by G. Rosenbaum, K. C. Holmes, Synchrotron Radiaion Research, H. Winick, S. Doniach, eds., Plenum, New York (1980) page 533.

  12. 12. Detailed accounts of x‐ray microscopy are contained in Synchrotron Radiation Research, H. Winick, S. Doniach, eds., Plenum, New York (1980):
    A. R. Neureuther, page 233;
    J. Kirz, D. Sayre, page 277;
    C. J. Sparks, Jr., page 459;
    M. Sauvage, J. F. Petroff, page 607.

  13. 13. P. Horowitz, J. A. Howell, Science 178, 608 (1972).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  14. 14. C. J. Sparks, Jr., S. Raman, E. Ricci, R. V. Gentry, M. O. Krause, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 507 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  15. 15. J. F. Petroff, M. Sauvage, J. Cryst. Growth, 43, 628 (1978).

  16. 16. D. Mills, B. W. Batterman, Phys. Rev. B22, 2887 (1980).

  17. 17. C. J. Sparks, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 262 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  18. 18. P. Eisenberger, P. M. Platzman, H. Winick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 623 (1976).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  19. 19. G. S. Brown, M. H. Chen, B. Crasemann, G. E. Ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1937 (1980).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the authors

Cullie J. Sparks, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

Related content
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
/
Article
Detecting quantum particles of gravity was long considered hopeless. A new perspective, which takes advantage of quantum technologies, suggests that an experimental realization may be closer than previously thought.
/
Article
As higher-education programs compete for a shrinking pool of students, departments must better communicate the value that a physics major brings.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1981_05.jpeg

Volume 34, Number 5

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.