Discover
/
Article

Free nuclear induction

NOV 01, 1953
Unusually clear measurements of the time precession of nuclear magnetic moments and other properties of nuclei have become possible with the development of the free induction “spin echo” technique in the still new science of nuclear magnetic resonance.
E. L. Hahn

The study of nuclear magnetic resonance or nuclear induction, a recent field of research for which F. Bloch and E. M. Purcell have been awarded the Nobel Prize, has been carried out by a variety of techniques. The usual approach has been to observe the nuclear resonance of an ensemble of nuclear moments in a large static magnetic field as a function of a slow change in this field. Meanwhile, a small radio‐frequency field is applied continuously to the nuclear sample in a direction perpendicular to the large field. An alternative method to this steady state or “slow passage” technique is one by which the radio‐frequency energy is applied to the sample in the form of short, intense pulses, and nuclear signals are observed after the pulses are removed. The effects which result can be compared to the free vibration or “ringing” of a bell, a term often applied to the free harmonic oscillations of a shocked inductive‐capacitive (LC) circuit. The circuit is first supplied with electrical energy from some source, and the supply of energy is suddenly removed. The LC circuit then remains for a time in the “excited state”, and the energy is gradually dissipated into heat, mostly in the circuit resistance. Similarly the atom or nucleus in the excited state can store energy for a time before it is completely dissipated, and in the case discussed here, the free oscillation or precession of an ensemble of nuclear spins in a large static field provides the ringing process.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. F. Bloch, Physical Review 70, 460 (1946).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  2. 2. Bloembergen, Purcell, and Pound, Physical Review 73, 679 (1948).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. Rabi, Millman, Kusch, and Zacharias, Physical Review 55, 526 (1939).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  4. 4. E. L. Hahn, Physical Review 77, 297 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  5. 5. E. L. Hahn, Physical Review 80, 580 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  6. 6. H. S. Gutowsky, D. W. McCall, and C. P. Slichter, Journal of Physical Chemistry 21, 279 (1953).https://doi.org/JPCHAX

  7. 7. E. L. Hahn and D. E. Maxwell, Physical Review 88, 1070 (1952).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

More about the Authors

E. L. Hahn. Columbia University.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1953_11.jpeg

Volume 6, Number 11

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.