Discover
/
Article

Computers in physics instruction

SEP 01, 1969
In a rapidly growing field computers talk to students, simulate experiments, calculate and perform many special tasks. Problems remain to be solved, but if advantages are exploited and costs reduced, computers should become effective, uncomplaining tutors.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3035781

Guenter Schwarz
Ora M. Kromhout
Steve Edwards

THE PHENOMENAL IMPACT of the modern digital computer on our society has not bypassed physics instruction. As early as the late 1950’s and early 1960’s research was going on at the Universities of Michigan and Illinois on computers in science and engineering education. Development of the field was stimulated by two conferences in 1965 at the University of California, Irvine, and the University of Washington. The reports on these conferences are basic references for anyone wishing to look further into the subject. The number and variety of current projects in the field is increasing rapidly, as indicated by the sections devoted to the subject at annual meetings of the American Association of Physics Teachers.

References

  1. 1. Instruction by Design: A Report on the Conference on New Instructional Materials in Physics Held at the University of Washington, Summer 1965, Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md.

  2. 2. The Computer in Physics Instruction: Report of the Conference on the Uses of the Computer in Undergraduate Physics Instruction Held November 4–6, 1965 at the University of California, Irvine, Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md.

  3. 3. A. M. Bork, “Least Action via Computer,” Am. J. Phys. 37, 386 (1969).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  4. 4. J. Weizenbaum, “Contextual Understanding by Computers,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 10, 474 (1967).

  5. 5. E. F. Taylor, “Automated Tutoring and its Discontents,” Am. J. Phys. 36, 496 (1968).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  6. 6. Short Films for Physics Teaching: A Catalog, Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md. (1967).

  7. 7. A. Goldberg, H. M. Schey, J. L. Schwartz, “Computer‐Generated Motion Pictures of One‐Dimensional Quantum‐Mechanical Transmission and Reflection Phenomena,” Am. J. Phys. 35, 177 (1967).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  8. 8. J. L. Schwartz, E. F. Taylor, “Computer Displays in the Teaching of Physics,” American Federation of Information Processing Societies Conference Proceedings 33, 1285 (1968).

  9. 9. W. Stenberg et al., Calculus: A Computer Oriented Presentation, Center for Research in College Instruction of Science and Mathematics, Tallahas‐see, Fla. (preliminary edition, 1968).

  10. 10. “Computer Classroom,” Intermediate Science Curriculum Study Newsletter, no. 3, October 1967, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Fla.

  11. 11. A. M. Bork, “Computers in High School Physics,” The Physics Teacher 6, 296 (1968).

  12. 12. C. H. Frye, “CAI Languages: Capabilities and Applications,” Datamation 14, no. 9, 34 (1968).https://doi.org/DTMNAT

  13. 13. The Dartmouth Time‐Sharing Computing System, Final Report, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N. H. (1967).

  14. 14. A. Luehrmann, “The Square Well in Quantum Mechanics,” Am. J. Phys. 35, 275 (1967).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  15. 15. A. M. Bork, A. Luehrmann, J. W. Robson, Introductory Computer‐Based Mechanics: A One Week Sample Course (R. Blum, ed.), Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md. (1968).

  16. 16. O. M. Kromhout, S. Edwards, G. Schwarz, “A Computer Guided General Education Physics Course,” Am. J. Phys. 37, (Oct., 1969) (in press).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  17. 17. A. M. Bork, “Computers and the Nonscience Major,” Am. J. Phys. 34, 926 (1966).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  18. 18. J. H. Kanner, “CAI—The New Demonology?” Datamation 14, no. 9, 38 (1968).https://doi.org/DTMNAT

  19. 19. K. L. Zinn, “Instructional Uses of Interactive Computer Systems,” Datamation 14, no. 9, 22 (1968).https://doi.org/DTMNAT

  20. 20. P. H. Abelson, “Computer‐Assisted Instruction,” Science 162, 855 (1968).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  21. 21. A. M. Bork, “A Physics Independent Study Course with Computer,” Am. J. Phys. 31, 364 (1963).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  22. 22. Op. cit. ref. 2, p. 52.

  23. 23. A. M. Bork, Notions about Motion (Mimeographed text, University of California, Irvine, 1968).

  24. 24. D. N. Hansen, W. Dick, H. T. Lippert, Semiannual Progress Report, July 1, 1967, through Dec. 31, 1967, (Florida State University Computer Assisted Instruction Center Report no. 6, Tallahassee, Fla., 1968).

  25. 25. D. N. Hansen, W. Dick, H. T. Lippert, Semiannual Progress Report, Jan. 1, 1967 through June 20, 1967. (Florida State University Computer Assisted Instruction Center Report no. 5, Tallahassee,, Fla., 1967).

  26. 26. E. R. Lyman, A Descriptive List of Plato Programs, 1960 to 1968, Computer‐Based Education Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.

  27. 27. A. Goldberg, H. M. Schey, J. L. Schwartz, “Edge Effects in One‐Dimensional Scattering,” Am. J. Phys. 35, 777 (1967).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  28. 28. D. T. Axelrod, J. L. Schwartz, “Scattering of Charged Particles From a Variety of Charge Distributions,” Am. J. Phys. 35, 1162 (1967).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  29. 29. A. Goldberg, H. M. Schey, J. L. Schwartz, “One‐Dimensional Scattering in Configuration Space and Momentum Space,” Am. J. Phys. 36, 454 (1968).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  30. 30. W. E. Daniels, J. L. Schwartz, “A Quantum‐Mechanical Ripple Tank,” Am. J. Phys. 36, 1088 (1968).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  31. 31. R. C. Rosenberg, Computer‐Aided Teaching of Dynamic System Behavior (Technical Report ESD‐TR‐260, Electronic Systems Division, USAF Systems Command, Bedford, Mass., 1965) (copies available from author).

  32. 32. A. M. Bork, “Using Computers in Teaching Elementary Physics,” in Northeast Electronic Research and Engineering Meeting Record (1967).

  33. 33. A. M. Bork, “Computers and The Feynman Lectures on Physics,” Am. J. Phys. 32, 173 (1964).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  34. 34. A. M. Bork, FORTRAN for Physics, Addison—Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, Mass. (1967).

  35. 35. A. M. Bork, Using the IBM—1130, Addison—Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, Mass. (1968).

  36. 36. A. M. Bork, Physics and the Computer—An Introduction to Classical Mechanics and JOSS, (Preliminary version, unpublished) (1967).

  37. 37. A. M. Bork, “Instructional Uses of the Computer: 1130 FORTRAN Mechanics Program,” Am. J. Phys. 36, 907 (1968).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  38. 38. A. F. Vierling, J. L. Jones, Physics Problem Workbook, (A subproject under Naval Bureau of Personnel). (US Naval Academy technical report no. TDP43‐03X).

  39. 39. A. F. Vierling, J. S. Vierling, Computer Assisted Learning, Hafner Publishing Co, New York (1968).

  40. 40. R. W. Brehme, The ELIZA System at Wake Forest University: ELIZA: A Skimmahle Report on the ELIZA Conversational Tutoring System, MIT Education Research Center, Cambridge, Mass. (1968).

More about the Authors

Guenter Schwarz. Center for Research, College Instruction of Science and Mathematics, Florida State University.

Ora M. Kromhout. Computer Assisted Instruction Center of Florida State.

Steve Edwards. Florida State.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_09.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 9

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.