New clean-energy regulations will bring new federal loans for technology development
DOI: 10.1063/PT.5.8007
A passage in President Obama’s second inaugural address last January began, “We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.” Now, in a pair of 20 September articles, the New York Times reports that the Obama administration is circumventing Congress and requiring cleaner energy technology in US electricity production; the administration will also offer loans to promote that technology’s development.
The article “Administration presses ahead with limits on emissions from power plants
That article also addresses the topic that the second article engages: technology to enable power plants to comply. “Opponents of the new rules,” it reports, “argue that the technology to affordably reduce carbon emissions at power plants is not yet available.” It adds that industry representatives “argue that such technology has not been proven on a large scale and would be extraordinarily expensive—and therefore in violation of provisions in the Clean Air Act
The second article, “US revives aid program for clean energy
The Times reports crticism: “Officials say the federal subsidies are necessary to support the development of technologies that are too complex, unproven and expensive for investors and private companies to pursue on their own, assertions that have already stirred criticism from opponents who see the program as too risky and a misuse of taxpayer money.”
The Times also reports skepticism:
A spokeswoman for the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which is controlled by Republicans, who have been critical of the loans in the past, took a skeptical view of the program.
“The D.O.E. loan guarantee program’s history of mismanagement, bankruptcies and failure to deliver the jobs promised raises significant concerns about risking billions in additional taxpayer dollars,” Charlotte Baker said. “We are supportive of efforts to encourage the development of advanced fossil fuel technologies, but we are skeptical that federal loan guarantees are the best way” to bring that about.
Analysts and climate experts also questioned whether the program, which was originally established in 2005 and whose new guidelines will be completed this fall, could make the technologies economically viable on a mass scale. No ventures in the US currently achieve this, despite years of government-sponsored research and development, according to the Congressional Research Service.
---
Steven T. Corneliussen, a media analyst for the American Institute of Physics, monitors three national newspapers, the weeklies Nature and Science, and occasionally other publications. He has published op-eds in the Washington Post and other newspapers, has written for NASA’s history program, and is a science writer at a particle-accelerator laboratory.