Wandering surface atoms and the field ion microscope

JUN 01, 1981

New insight into the atomic action that underlies the physical and chemical properties of surfaces is coming from time‐sequence pictures of individual atoms on crystal planes.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2914605

Gert Ehrlich

Interest in information about individual atoms on crystal surfaces has been strong since the early 1930s. By then it had become clear that to understand technologically important surface phenomena such as crystal and thin‐film growth, heterogeneous catalysis, sintering and surface oxidation, it was necessary to understand atomic processes at crystal surfaces. In response to this need for qualitative and quantitative knowledge physicists and chemists developed detailed models of atomic activity on crystal surfaces. However, for many decades there was no way to confront speculation with actual data on atomic behavior—that would require observations of individual atoms. No less a capability is now available (see figure 1) through the use of the field ion microscope. As we will see, observations of individual atoms have not only provided much interesting information on surfaces but they have also become surprisingly routine.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. W. K. Burton, N. Cabrera, F. C. Frank, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 243, 299 (1951).
2. Background on the technique and its history is given by E. W. Müller, T. T. Tsong, Field Ion Microscopy, Elsevier, New York (1968).
3. D. N. Seidman, Surf. Sci. 70, 532 (1978); https://doi.org/SUSCAS
R. Wagner, Phys. Bl. 36, 65 (1980).
4. J. R. Oppenheimer, Phys. Rev. 13, 66 (1928);
J. A. Appelbaum, E. G. McRae, Surf. Sci. 47, 445 (1975).https://doi.org/SUSCAS
5. A. J. Melmed, R. T. Tung, W. R. Graham, G. D. W. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1521 (1979).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
6. W. R. Graham, G. Ehrlich, Surf. Sci. 45, 530 (1974); https://doi.org/SUSCAS
P. G. Flahive, W. R. Graham, Thin Solid Films 51, 175 (1978); https://doi.org/THSFAP
P. G. Flahive, W. R. Graham, Surf. Sci. 51, 175 (1978).https://doi.org/SUSCAS
7. G. Ehrlich, C. F. Kirk, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 1465 (1968); https://doi.org/JCPSA6
E. W. Plummer, T. N. Rhodin, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 3479 (1968).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
8. References to much of the literature up to 1980 are given by G. Ehrlich, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 9 (1980);
or G. Ehrlich, K. Stolt, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31, 603 (1980).
9. D. W. Bassett, Surf. Sci. 53, 74 (1975).https://doi.org/SUSCAS
10. D. W. Bassett, P. R. Webber, Surf. Sci. 70, 520 (1978).https://doi.org/SUSCAS
11. J. D. Wrigley, G. Ehrlich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 661 (1980).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. R. T. Tung, W. R. Graham, Surf. Sci. 97, 73 (1980).https://doi.org/SUSCAS
13. For a recent review see G. Ehrlich and K. Stolt, in Growth and Properties of Metal Clusters, edited by J. Bourdon, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1980), page 1.
14. D. W. Bassett, J. Phys. C 9, 2491 (1976);
G. L. Kellogg, T. T. Tsong, P. Cowan, Surf. Sci. 70, 485 (1978); https://doi.org/SUSCAS
T. T. Tsong and R. Casanova, Phys. Rev. B 21, 4564 (1980).
15. References are to be found in H.‐W. Fink, K. Faulian, E. Brauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1008 (1980).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. D. W. Bassett, D. R. Tice, in The Physical Basis of Heterogeneous Catalysis, edited by E. Drauglis, R. I. Jaffee, Plenum, New York (1975), page 231.
17. R. Casanova, T. T. Tsong, Phys. Rev. B 22, 5590 (1980).

More about the authors

Gert Ehrlich, University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign.